1979
DOI: 10.1061/ajgeb6.0000803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Railroad Ballast Sizing and Grading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mosaid (1983) carried out triaxial consolidation drainage shear tests on materials with the particle size of 0.6-6.4 mm, 0.6-12.7 mm, 0.6-25.4 mm, 0.6-50.8 mm, and 0.6-76.2 mm, respectively; the tests results indicated that an increase in particle size would increase the shear strength of sample. Raymond and Diyaljee (1979) also obtained the same test result. Through conducting direct shear tests on mixture of sand (0-2 mm) and gravel (2-6 mm, 2-20 mm), Simoni and Houlsby (2006) and Hubler et al (2014) noticed that material with larger grains showed a higher value of constant volume friction angle.…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Ergulersupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Mosaid (1983) carried out triaxial consolidation drainage shear tests on materials with the particle size of 0.6-6.4 mm, 0.6-12.7 mm, 0.6-25.4 mm, 0.6-50.8 mm, and 0.6-76.2 mm, respectively; the tests results indicated that an increase in particle size would increase the shear strength of sample. Raymond and Diyaljee (1979) also obtained the same test result. Through conducting direct shear tests on mixture of sand (0-2 mm) and gravel (2-6 mm, 2-20 mm), Simoni and Houlsby (2006) and Hubler et al (2014) noticed that material with larger grains showed a higher value of constant volume friction angle.…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Ergulersupporting
confidence: 59%
“…They tested three gradings, noted in Figure 1. Furthermore, when they compared uniformly graded ballasts alone (38-mm against 4.76-mm maximum grain size), the smaller-sized ballast was shown to give less-permanent deformation (2). Thus, where permanent strain is a major concern, the advantage of smaller-sized single-graded ballast should be considered.…”
Section: Roar Nålsundmentioning
confidence: 99%