1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4487(99)00177-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radon measurements during the building of a low-level laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 summarizes the comparison between our results with those conducted in other countries. It seems that our results are near or around the other results [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Table 5 summarizes the comparison between our results with those conducted in other countries. It seems that our results are near or around the other results [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…After three months of exposure, the detectors were sent back to the Low-Level Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Belgrade. In our laboratory, there is a long and successful tradition of radon measurements with etched track detectors [9], [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can be used to determine the radon gas concentration in indoor environments, mines, underground metro stations, and caves [14,20]. Solid-state nuclear trace detectors (cellulose nitrate (LR-115) and allyl diglycol carbonate (CR-39)) are often preferred in the passive measurement method [34,82,[178][179][180][181][182].…”
Section: Passive Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%