2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radon exhalation study of manganese clay residue and usability in brick production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average of the emanation factor was 2.7 %. This variation of the emanation factor of certain materials can be explained by the different emanation coefficients, which depends on the characteristic of the material matrix (Hegedus et al, 2016;Kovacs et al, 2016;Sas et al, 2015b). The results generally match results that were reported in various publications (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2013).…”
Section: Radon Emanation and Massic Exhalation Features Of The Studiesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The average of the emanation factor was 2.7 %. This variation of the emanation factor of certain materials can be explained by the different emanation coefficients, which depends on the characteristic of the material matrix (Hegedus et al, 2016;Kovacs et al, 2016;Sas et al, 2015b). The results generally match results that were reported in various publications (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2013).…”
Section: Radon Emanation and Massic Exhalation Features Of The Studiesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Consequently, the definition of the dose rates helps to make some preventive measures to be sure that the doses do not exceed the recommended limits. Moreover, the knowledge about gamma radiation is important in the construction industry to be capable to adopt preventative measures and decrease the unhealthy effects of the ionizing radiation (Kovács et al 2017a , b ; Ignjatović et al 2017 ; Lee et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibrations were conducted using the same method explained in our previous publication [19][20][21].…”
Section: Radiation Dose Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%