Radiomics for Discriminating Benign and Malignant Salivary Gland Tumors; Which Radiomic Feature Categories and MRI Sequences Should Be Used?

Abstract

The lack of a consistent MRI radiomic signature, partly due to the multitude of initial feature analyses, limits the widespread clinical application of radiomics for the discrimination of salivary gland tumors (SGTs). This study aimed to identify the optimal radiomics feature category and MRI sequence for characterizing SGTs, which could serve as a step towards obtaining a consensus on a radiomics signature. Preliminary radiomics models were built to discriminate malignant SGTs (n = 34) from benign SGTs (n = 57) on T1-weighted (T1WI), fat-suppressed (FS)-T2WI and contrast-enhanced (CE)-T1WI images using six feature categories. The discrimination performances of these preliminary models were evaluated using 5-fold-cross-validation with 100 repetitions and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The differences between models’ performances were identified using one-way ANOVA. Results show that the best feature categories were logarithm for T1WI and CE-T1WI and exponential for FS-T2WI, with AUCs of 0.828, 0.754 and 0.819, respectively. These AUCs were higher than the AUCs obtained using all feature categories combined, which were 0.750, 0.707 and 0.774, respectively (p < 0.001). The highest AUC (0.846) was obtained using a combination of T1WI + logarithm and FS-T2WI + exponential features, which reduced the initial features by 94.0% (from 1015 × 3 to 91 × 2). CE-T1WI did not improve performance. Using one feature category rather than all feature categories combined reduced the number of initial features without compromising radiomic performance.

Trends and Hotspots in Global Radiomics Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…The results demonstrate the wide range of applications of radiomics in various neoplastic disease systems. 45 – 48 …”

An Informative Review of Radiomics Studies on Cancer Imaging: The Main Findings, Challenges and Limitations of the Methodologies

“…Furthermore, some important aspects have not always been considered by the authors such as the importance of the external validation of the set in the evaluation of the intra and inter-observer variability and in the balancing of the data set. In fact, the critical problems in radiomics use are the insufficient standardization and generalization of radiomics results, data quality control, repeatability, reproducibility, database matching and model overfitting issues [55,57].…”

“…A key attention is to determine the availability of sufficient data to support the development of a radiomics signature. As a rule, for binary classification studies, one should aim to obtain at least 10-15 samples for each feature that is provided in the final radiomics signature [55,57].…”

Support Tools in the Differential Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Tumors through Inflammatory Biomarkers and Radiomics Metrics: A Preliminary Study

“…Rongli Zhang et al studied the impact of reducing the number of initial radiomic features on the performance of radiomic models to differentiate between benign and malignant SGTs. They applied six feature categories separately and all the feature categories in combination from three anatomy-based MRI sequences [ 27 ].…”