2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08146-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiomic machine learning for predicting prognostic biomarkers and molecular subtypes of breast cancer using tumor heterogeneity and angiogenesis properties on MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the five machine learning models tested, the integrated random forest model was the best for the overall prediction of histological factors (median AUC = 0.76), and the random forest model was best for the prediction of HER2 expression (AUC = 0.86). These results are similar to those reported for an integrated model using texture and perfusion features of breast cancer on MRI (AUC = 0.80) in a recent study by Lee et al [6]. In our study, the most important top five CT parameters for prediction were entropy on contrast-enhanced images, entropy on precontrast images, perfusion of hot spots, TTP of hot spots, and PEI of hot spots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the five machine learning models tested, the integrated random forest model was the best for the overall prediction of histological factors (median AUC = 0.76), and the random forest model was best for the prediction of HER2 expression (AUC = 0.86). These results are similar to those reported for an integrated model using texture and perfusion features of breast cancer on MRI (AUC = 0.80) in a recent study by Lee et al [6]. In our study, the most important top five CT parameters for prediction were entropy on contrast-enhanced images, entropy on precontrast images, perfusion of hot spots, TTP of hot spots, and PEI of hot spots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recent studies have shown that applying machine learning algorithms to radiolog data is useful for predicting histological factors or treatment response in breast can patients [6,7,[20][21][22]. We evaluated CT-based predictions of histological factors treatment failure using five supervised machine learning algorithms: logistic regress naïve Bayes, decision tree, random forest, and artificial neural network (ANN).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies applied radiomics based on breast MRI for the evaluation of malignancy, differentiation of molecular subtype, prediction of receptor expression, and evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer (27,(32)(33)(34)(35). Some studies have reported that quantitative parameters of functional MRI, deep learning analysis, and MRI-based radiomics analysis had the potential in predicting molecular subtype and Ki-67 expression in breast cancer (36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45). However, no published study reported the accuracy of MRI combining with radiomics in predicting AR expression and explored the importance of different MRI sequences in predicting molecular subtype of breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomic features could also reflect the angiogenesis status and microvascular density in bladder urothelial carcinoma and in clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma [ 42 , 43 ]. Radiomic parameters also predict microvascular density and angiogenesis in breast cancer [ 44 , 45 , 46 ]. In the study by Dooman Arefan and collaborators, a set of radiomic features identified the heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment cells, with an abundance of fibroblasts and the presence of endothelial and immune cells [ 44 ].…”
Section: Liver Premetastatic Niche Formation In Crc Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasonably, the different phases of metastatic niche formation (each one represented by a puzzle piece in the figure) could be detected by radiogenomics approaches in the near future. The references included in the figure show related manuscript with information about tumor cell extravasation [ 34 , 35 ], neoangiogenesis [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], immunosurveillance evasion [ 44 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ] and tumor growth [ 41 ] that could be theoretically translated to metastatic niche detection. Created with BioRender.com.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%