Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate whether radiomics features extracted from multi-parametric MRI combining machine learning approach can predict molecular subtype and androgen receptor (AR) expression of breast cancer in a non-invasive way.Materials and MethodsPatients diagnosed with clinical T2–4 stage breast cancer from March 2016 to July 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. The molecular subtypes and AR expression in pre-treatment biopsy specimens were assessed. A total of 4,198 radiomics features were extracted from the pre-biopsy multi-parametric MRI (including dynamic contrast-enhancement T1-weighted images, fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, and apparent diffusion coefficient map) of each patient. We applied several feature selection strategies including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and recursive feature elimination (RFE), the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR), Boruta and Pearson correlation analysis, to select the most optimal features. We then built 120 diagnostic models using distinct classification algorithms and feature sets divided by MRI sequences and selection strategies to predict molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer in the testing dataset of leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The performances of binary classification models were assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). And the performances of multiclass classification models were assessed via AUC, overall accuracy, precision, recall rate, and F1-score.ResultsA total of 162 patients (mean age, 46.91 ± 10.08 years) were enrolled in this study; 30 were low-AR expression and 132 were high-AR expression. HR+/HER2− cancers were diagnosed in 56 cases (34.6%), HER2+ cancers in 81 cases (50.0%), and TNBC in 25 patients (15.4%). There was no significant difference in clinicopathologic characteristics between low-AR and high-AR groups (P > 0.05), except the menopausal status, ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 index (P = 0.043, <0.001, <0.001, 0.015, and 0.006, respectively). No significant difference in clinicopathologic characteristics was observed among three molecular subtypes except the AR status and Ki-67 (P = <0.001 and 0.012, respectively). The Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) showed the best performance in discriminating AR expression, with an AUC of 0.907 and an accuracy of 85.8% in the testing dataset. The highest performances were obtained for discriminating TNBC vs. non-TNBC (AUC: 0.965, accuracy: 92.6%), HER2+ vs. HER2− (AUC: 0.840, accuracy: 79.0%), and HR+/HER2− vs. others (AUC: 0.860, accuracy: 82.1%) using MLP as well. The micro-AUC of MLP multiclass classification model was 0.896, and the overall accuracy was 0.735.ConclusionsMulti-parametric MRI-based radiomics combining with machine learning approaches provide a promising method to predict the molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer non-invasively.

Intra- and Peritumoral Radiomics Model Based on Early DCE-MRI for Preoperative Prediction of Molecular Subtypes in Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma: A Multitask Machine Learning Study

“…Comparatively, the model performance was not adequate in task 4 (training cohort: 0.697; test cohort: 0.663). The result is in agreement with a recent study by Huang et al who built ternary classification MRI-based models to predict molecular subtypes of breast cancer (accuracy, 0.623-0.735) (36). Although we incorporated the optimal peritumoral features, the performance is still unsatisfactory in the ternary classification task.…”

Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting H3 K27M Mutant Status in Diffuse Midline Glioma: A Comparative Study Across Different Sequences and Machine Learning Techniques

“…According to previous results, the feature selector and classifier were two major determinant factors of radiomics model performance ( 20 – 23 , 38 , 39 ). When a suitable classifier was used, there was no significant difference in the AUC value of different sequences.…”

Potential of the Non-Contrast-Enhanced Chest CT Radiomics to Distinguish Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study

“…found that the combination of radiomics and machine learning based on multi-parameter MRI provides a promising method for the non-invasive prediction of molecular subtypes and androgen receptor expression of breast cancer. The MLP classifier showed the best performance in discriminating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) vs. non-TNBC (AUC, 0.965; accuracy, 92.6%) ( 22 ). Choudhery et al.…”