2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00029-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiometric normalization of multitemporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
238
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
238
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Landsat images were processed in two steps: (1) radiometric calibration and (2) atmospheric correction; these steps are the two types of corrections that are commonly employed to normalize remotely sensed images (Coppin, Jonckheere, Nackaerts, Muys, & Lambin, 2004;Du, Teillet, & Cihlar, 2002;Kaufman, 1998;Roy et al, 2016;Schott, 1997;Song, Woodcock, Seto, Lenney, & Macomber, 2001). This method of data acquisition and data extraction has been used in numerous studies that focused on mapping different phenomena or on particular properties that occur or are revealed on the Earth's surface, such as mining activities (Cutaia, Massacci, & Roselli, 2004;Lobo, Costa, & Novo, 2015), water quality parameters and temperature (Bonansea et al, 2015;Ding & Elmore, 2015;Tebbs, Remedios, & Harper, 2013), water surface extent and dynamics (Mueller et al, 2016) and mapping major flood events (Bhatt et al, 2016;Cutaia et al, 2004;Sakai et al, 2015;Sandholt et al, 2003;Thomas et al, 2015;Tulbure et al, 2016;Wang, 2004;Yang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Remote Sensing Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landsat images were processed in two steps: (1) radiometric calibration and (2) atmospheric correction; these steps are the two types of corrections that are commonly employed to normalize remotely sensed images (Coppin, Jonckheere, Nackaerts, Muys, & Lambin, 2004;Du, Teillet, & Cihlar, 2002;Kaufman, 1998;Roy et al, 2016;Schott, 1997;Song, Woodcock, Seto, Lenney, & Macomber, 2001). This method of data acquisition and data extraction has been used in numerous studies that focused on mapping different phenomena or on particular properties that occur or are revealed on the Earth's surface, such as mining activities (Cutaia, Massacci, & Roselli, 2004;Lobo, Costa, & Novo, 2015), water quality parameters and temperature (Bonansea et al, 2015;Ding & Elmore, 2015;Tebbs, Remedios, & Harper, 2013), water surface extent and dynamics (Mueller et al, 2016) and mapping major flood events (Bhatt et al, 2016;Cutaia et al, 2004;Sakai et al, 2015;Sandholt et al, 2003;Thomas et al, 2015;Tulbure et al, 2016;Wang, 2004;Yang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Remote Sensing Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective was to minimize errors in vegetation index calculation and change detection analysis as described in the next session. The procedure adopted for radiometric correction includes: (1) converting image digital numbers to apparent reflectance (Anderson and Milton, 2005;Gomez et al, 2005;Li and Niu, 2006); and (2) radiometric normalization (Canty et al, 2004;Du et al, 2002). In this study, the reflective radiance, R r , of the Formosat-2 images was converted from the original digital numbers (DN) and provided sensor calibration factors (gain and offset) as:…”
Section: Radiometric Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After converting all image data into apparent reflectance, radiometric normalization was further applied to images covering the same area. The normalization is based on pseudoinvariant features that can be selected interactively (Schott et al, 1988) or according to statistic characteristics (Du et al, 2002) calculated from the images. In this research, instead of processing only the study area, the radiometric corrections were carried out over the complete images.…”
Section: Radiometric Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, all remotely sensed images are subject to geometric distortion (Du et al 2002, Guienko 2004) and, while this may be relatively inconsequential for single-date analysis where general spatial patterns are sought, it can be a major difficulty for multi-temporal analysis where images are compared on a spatial basis. Therefore, all investigations involving multi-temporal imagery require accurate geometric co-registration to register multiple images to each other or to a common coordinate system (Coppin and Bauer 1996, Eugenio and Marques 2003, Siqueira et al 2004).…”
Section: Temporal Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, any such inconsistencies between images may create difficulties for multi-temporal analysis, and corrections are often necessary prior to temporal comparison (Song et al 2001, Liang et al 2002, Richter and Schlapfer 2002, Steven et al 2003. Rather than performing absolute corrections to generate true reflectance values, multi-temporal studies often use image matching or normalization, whereby discrepancies between images are simply averaged out (Du et al 2002, Canty et al 2004, Nelson et al 2005. However, there are certain circumstances where multi-temporal analysis may not require any radiometric, atmospheric or illumination corrections.…”
Section: Temporal Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%