2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160500396477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On scales and dynamics in observing the environment

Abstract: Natural and anthropogenic processes at the Earth's surface operate at a range of spatial and temporal scales. Different scales of observation are required to match the spatial scales of the processes under observation. At the same time, the temporal sampling rate of the observing systems must be reconciled with the dynamics of the processes observed. Bringing together these issues requires insight, innovation and, inevitably, compromise. This paper reviews spatial and temporal considerations in remote sensing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall accuracy of the classification was high reaching up to 70% (κ = 0.41) for 6 m and 63% (κ = 0.27) for 20 m resolution modes. The reduction in accuracy with 20 m resolution map is due to the nature of the MLC algorithm which allocates every pixel to only one class rather than the actual mixed land cover and the size of the signal resolution resulting in mixed pixels [51,56]. This also means that the level of misclassification due to the pixels of multiple land cover classes is a function of spatial resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall accuracy of the classification was high reaching up to 70% (κ = 0.41) for 6 m and 63% (κ = 0.27) for 20 m resolution modes. The reduction in accuracy with 20 m resolution map is due to the nature of the MLC algorithm which allocates every pixel to only one class rather than the actual mixed land cover and the size of the signal resolution resulting in mixed pixels [51,56]. This also means that the level of misclassification due to the pixels of multiple land cover classes is a function of spatial resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of combined hyperspectral and LIDAR data has been shown to increase significantly the accuracy of extraction of biophysical and hybrid variables [23,25], and the idea of combining datasets of different spatial and spectral resolutions is established in the literature [26][27][28]. Such a combination may allow for a stronger definition of the relationship between forest structure and spectra [29,30]. Naturally, a combination technique will still have the drawback of higher associated costs.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Of Forested Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecologically, peatlands are characterised by a wide diversity and complexity in their composition and interaction between different vegetation types [21]. Peatland restoration monitoring, therefore, requires monitoring of vegetation composition on a fine spatial scale, to match the spatial scales of the processes under observation [22]. A pixel size of less than 3.45 m is recommended, in an intact upland peatland, to determine patch size in the vegetation [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%