[Proceedings] IGARSS '92 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.1992.578660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiometric and Geometric Correction of Tm-Data of Mountainous Forested Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a LIDAR‐based 1.8‐m DEM (Terrapoint 2003) and KH‐4B satellite specifications from declassified documents (McDonald 1995) to model the terrain and satellite position during orthorectification. Pre‐processing procedures were employed to remove systematic errors from the DEM (Keqi et al 2003; Rottensteiner et al 2005) and the Minnaert correction was used to mitigate radiometric variability from the imagery, which is common in mountainous areas (Itten & Meyer 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a LIDAR‐based 1.8‐m DEM (Terrapoint 2003) and KH‐4B satellite specifications from declassified documents (McDonald 1995) to model the terrain and satellite position during orthorectification. Pre‐processing procedures were employed to remove systematic errors from the DEM (Keqi et al 2003; Rottensteiner et al 2005) and the Minnaert correction was used to mitigate radiometric variability from the imagery, which is common in mountainous areas (Itten & Meyer 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied calibration coefficients to estimate at-satellite radiance (Chander et al 2004) and a modified 5S radiative transfer model that incorporates a terrain-dependent illumination correction (Radeloff et al 1997) to calculate surface reflectance. To prevent overcorrection in areas of low illumination, the Minnaert constant (Itten and Meyer 1993) was set to 0.75 for the October image. Comparison of neighboring spectra from shaded and unshaded hillsides and visual assessments confirmed successful atmospheric and topographic correction.…”
Section: Preprocessing Of Landsat Tm and Etmþ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of these effects varies as a function of solar inclination and azimuth as well as slope incline and aspect [51,52]. In the mountainous regions of our study area, these effects are particularly pronounced at Eifel, Hunsrück, and Westerwald, where major morphological features extend almost orthogonally to the illumination azimuth (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Atmospheric Correctionmentioning
confidence: 91%