2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00586-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiology–Pathology Conference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GCTs differ from epithelial ovarian neoplasms via predominant unilaterality and confinement to the ovary with no peritoneal seeding at the time of the diagnosis in most cases (3,31). Moreover, GCTs usually do not feature intracystic papillary projections and rarely contain intratumoral calcifications (13,31,38).…”
Section: Pure Sex Cord Tumors Adult and Juvenile Granulosa Cell Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…GCTs differ from epithelial ovarian neoplasms via predominant unilaterality and confinement to the ovary with no peritoneal seeding at the time of the diagnosis in most cases (3,31). Moreover, GCTs usually do not feature intracystic papillary projections and rarely contain intratumoral calcifications (13,31,38).…”
Section: Pure Sex Cord Tumors Adult and Juvenile Granulosa Cell Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imaging appearances of these tumors vary according to the gross pathologic tumor characteristics. US and CT imaging usually reveal multicystic masses with solid components and either irregular thickened or thin septations (38) (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Pure Sex Cord Tumors Adult and Juvenile Granulosa Cell Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Granulosa cell tumors are rare sex cord stromal tumors, encompassing 1–5% of all ovarian tumors [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. These tumors are divided into juvenile and adult types, reflecting not only the typical age of presentation, the differentiating histologic characteristics but also the differing natural history [1, 2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%