2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-021-07897-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological impact assessment of different building material additives

Abstract: In this study, samples of building material additives were analyzed for naturally occurring radioisotope activity such as uranium, radium, and radon. The radon exhalation and the annual effective doses, were also calculated. The activities of the samples, were determined using HPGe gamma spectrometry and ionization detector. The results were used to calculate dose values by using RESRAD BUILD code. The activity concentration of the samples ranges between 9–494 Bq/kg Ra-226, 1–119 Bq/kg Th-232 and 24–730 Bq/kg … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For safety determination of construction materials, hazard indexes should be used only as a screening tool for identifying materials that might be of concern. A typical way of using a certain type of material from the aspect of radiological safety is related to dose assessment [ 62 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For safety determination of construction materials, hazard indexes should be used only as a screening tool for identifying materials that might be of concern. A typical way of using a certain type of material from the aspect of radiological safety is related to dose assessment [ 62 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Another major input parameter is surface radon exhalation rates. Average surface radon exhalation rates for cement samples were measured to be 3.1 ± 0.1 (Bq m −2 h −1 ) according to a closed accumulation chamber technique using a professional AlphaGUARD PQ2000 PRO, which has been outlined in detail by Kocsis et al 17 . Furthermore, Porestendorfer has summed up the others surveys and reported the typical range of surface radon exhalation rates for building materials used in different countries which fall within the range of 0.36–10.8 Bq m −2 h −1 20 .…”
Section: Models and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By taking into consideration the aforementioned criteria, a different range of ventilation rates from 0.3 to 4.3 h −1 (also reported by Zhou et al 8 and Agarwal et al 14 ) was considered and assessed in the current study. The radon source term as a key input parameter in the CFD software (ANSYS Fluent 2020 R1 based on the FVM) has also been measured by an accumulation chamber technique for samples of cement (comprehensively described in Kocsis et al 17 and Shahrokhi et al 18 ) before the simulations took into account the room geometry. To validate the simulation results, two pairs of common radon monitoring methods, namely NRPB and Raduet (as passive methods based on CR-39) as well as AlphaGUARD and RAD7 (as active methods), were also used to measure the indoor radon concentration under the aforementioned scenarios at various locations throughout the room.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These minerals are rich in appreciable concentrations of economic minerals along with some radioactive elements in concentrations higher than the ordinary global level, nevertheless, they do not necessarily have the same radiological indices or even exceed the permissible radiation limits (El-Kammar et al 2011; Abdel-Karim et al 2016). The inhalation of these minerals during their processing is one of the main threats, which depends mainly on the particle size and requires proper ventilation (Adelikhah et al 2020; Dodge-Wan and Viswanathan 2021; Kocsis et al 2021). In addition, radon-contained minerals in particular seriously affect the respiratory system and resulted in severe health problems (Khan et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%