1980
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800315)45:5+<1243::aid-cncr2820451334>3.0.co;2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioimmunodetection of colorectal cancer

Abstract: This study examines the accuracy of colorectal cancer radioimmunodetection. Twenty-seven patients with a history of histologically-confirmed colonic or rectal carcinoma received a high-titer, purified goat anti-CEA IgG labelled with 131-I at a total dose of at least 1.0 muCi. Various body views were scanned at 24 and 48 hours after administration of the radioantibody. Three additional cases were evaluated; one had a villous adenoma in the rectum and received the 131-I-labelled anti-CEA IgG, while two colonic c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use ofradioactive antibodies against certain tumor products for RaID has proved to be a new cancer detection modality (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). With affinity-purified antibodies to CEA, for example, RaID has been found to be a highly sensitive and specific method, even demonstrating tumor sites that were not revealed by more conventional techniques (3-5, 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The use ofradioactive antibodies against certain tumor products for RaID has proved to be a new cancer detection modality (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). With affinity-purified antibodies to CEA, for example, RaID has been found to be a highly sensitive and specific method, even demonstrating tumor sites that were not revealed by more conventional techniques (3-5, 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Conversely, false-positivity and false-negativity were defined as positive or negative RaID results, respectively, in patients in whom either no tumor sites were known or found later or who did not have elevated serum hCG titers. It is known from other studies with CEA RaID, however, that CEA-positive tumors can be localized by RaID even ifthe plasma CEA titer is not elevated (3)(4)(5)7), so that the category offalse-positivity may need to be modified once tissue levels of the hCG target molecule are determined. Nevertheless, 10 out of 10 testicular cancer patients with proven tumor sites had positive RaID results, whereas three cases without known tumor were negative, thus yielding a sensitivity (truepositive rate) of 100% and a specificity (true-negative rate) of 100%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A more general detection of metastases is possible by injections of radiolabelled anti-CEA antibodies and study of the location of the antibody in the patient. In one series all of seven primary tumours were detected by scintillation scanning procedures and 20 of 25 metastatic sites (56). In one patient with a rapidly rising CEA level CAT and Tc scan together with ultrasound methods had failed to detect the tumour discovered by this radioimmunolocation (RIL) method.…”
Section: Localisation Of Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 99%