2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03028-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic evaluation of congruency of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in hallux valgus

Abstract: Background Congruency of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint is extremely important for the selection of surgical methods and prognosis, while radiographic evaluation methods are relatively lacking. The purpose of this article was to explore radiographic indicators for evaluating congruency of the first MTP joint. Methods We selected patients with hallux valgus who had a weightbearing X-ray in the outpatient system and measured their hallux v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the postoperative incongruence of the metatarsophalangeal joint was encountered in 7 joints, and 28 joints were congruent. Yan Li et al [21] included 245 feet and evaluated the congruence of the first metatarsophalangeal joint after hallux valgus surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the postoperative incongruence of the metatarsophalangeal joint was encountered in 7 joints, and 28 joints were congruent. Yan Li et al [21] included 245 feet and evaluated the congruence of the first metatarsophalangeal joint after hallux valgus surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During arthrodesis in the standard fixation technique [ 35 ], the bones of the MTP-1 joint are brought closer to each other. However, due to the possible lack of congruency of the MTP-1 joint [ 36 ], an average small gap of 1 mm is assumed [ 32 , 37 ] between the metatarsal’s and phalanx’s cortical fracture bone fragments. Small callus inclusion (0.5 mm) into the trabecular bone is taken into account [ 21 , 22 , 29 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%