Radiographic cephalometry: From basics to 3-D imaging, 3rd edition

Jacobson, Alex; White, Larry W.

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.038

Cited by 76 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Jacobson and Jacobson 7 , these lateral teleradiographies should be performed with the patient's head immobilized by a cephalostat guided by the Frankfort Horizontal plane, parallel to the ground and perpendicular to the midsagittal plane. Teleradiographies showing orthodontic appliances, pathologies, dental anomalies and deciduous teeth were excluded.…”

Section: This Project Was Approved By the Research Ethicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cephalometric analysis: concordance between software

Correia

Sena

Silva

et al. 2017

RGO, Rev. Gaúch. Odontol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: This Project Was Approved By the Research Ethicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cephalometric analysis: concordance between software

Correia

Sena

Silva

et al. 2017

RGO, Rev. Gaúch. Odontol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…DISCUSSION The morphological assessment of sella turcica is a measuring tool in assessing the pituitary gland because the development of sella turcica is directly related to the development of pituitary gland, this is because the pituitary gland is in sella turcicaa and its development has been perfect before the development of sella turcica is completed so that pathological conditions that occur in the gland can cause morphological changes and the size of sella turcica. Morphological variations of sella turcica are reported in cases with severe craniofacial deviation, genetic disorders, abnormalities of the syndrome and dental anomalies such as ectopics and impaction [7,15,19,[22][23][24][25].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship between Morphology of Sella Turcica and Class II Skeletal Malocclusion in RSGMP FKG USU

Fitriasary¹,

Yusuf²,

Nazruddin³

2018

Proceedings of the International Dental Conference of Sumatera Utara 2017 (IDCSU 2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-In lateral cephalometric analysis sometimes found a borderline results, its difficult to ascertain the jaw skeletal relationship, in this situation, taking into account the morphological variation and the sidelines of the tursika on cephalometric radiography are expected to help to determine whether skeletal relationships Class I, II or III malocclusion. The sample in this study are 104 photos of lateral sefalometri divided into two groups Class I and Class II malocclusion based on the ANB value, each group was randomized and identified by morphology sella turcica following the theory of Axellson et al (2004), then compared with the value ANB from each group. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant differences between morphology variation of sella tursika in Class I and class II malocclusion, obtained normal morphology sella turcica at most in sample group of Class I (35 sample (83,3%)) and Class II (7 sample (16.7%)), ANB angle indicates the discrepancy of sagittal growth from the apical base of the jaw. Irregular (notching) posterior wall greater found in Class II malocclusion (26,9%) and in Class I malocclusion only 7,7%. There was significant differences in morphology of sella turcica in the group of patients with skeletal Class II malocclusions compared to patients with skeletal Class I malocclusions and there is a correlation of morphological variation of the sell of patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion.

show abstract

“…16,18 Lateral cephalometric radiographs used in this study to see the craniofacial morphology differences between children with of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate post labioplasty and palatoplasty with children without cleft lip and palate as it is a standardized method of measuring. 12 Cephalometric analysis is the most commonly used method to determine the dentocraniofacial morphology. 19 Cephalometric analysis is also a diagnostic support to determine the type and pattern of growth in the face so that the clinician can determine facial disharmony.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%