2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0265-931x(99)00089-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocaesium concentration factors of Chernobyl-contaminated fish: a study of the influence of potassium, and “blind” testing of a previously developed model

Abstract: Radiocaesium concentration factors of Chernobyl-contaminated fish: a study of the influence of potassium and "blind" testing of a previously developed model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
42
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the findings of a number of previous authors who have reported higher Cs concentrations in piscivorous, or predatory, fish compared to fish feeding on benthos, invertebrates and primary producers (e.g. Kryshev 1995, Kryshev et al, 1993Rowan et al, 1998;Rowan and Rasmussen, 1994;Saxén and Ilus, 2008;Smith et al, 2000). We should acknowledge that the data from some of these papers were included within our analyses, although they comprise a relatively small proportion of the total data available to us via the database described by Yankovich et al (in-press).…”
Section: Reml Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with the findings of a number of previous authors who have reported higher Cs concentrations in piscivorous, or predatory, fish compared to fish feeding on benthos, invertebrates and primary producers (e.g. Kryshev 1995, Kryshev et al, 1993Rowan et al, 1998;Rowan and Rasmussen, 1994;Saxén and Ilus, 2008;Smith et al, 2000). We should acknowledge that the data from some of these papers were included within our analyses, although they comprise a relatively small proportion of the total data available to us via the database described by Yankovich et al (in-press).…”
Section: Reml Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the case of Cs and freshwater fish a key site specific factor is the K concentration in water (e.g. Smith et al (2000) demonstrate approximately two-orders of magnitude variation in CR wo-water explained by water K concentration) with water pH and Ca concentration also being suggested to influence Cs transfer (Smith et al, 2002). Consequently, there is often large variation between the outputs of models using CR wo values to predict activity concentrations in wildlife (Beresford et al, 2008c;Yankovich et al, 2010;Johansen et al, 2012) and the approach is open to criticism as being too simplistic (ICRP 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Other Variables On Cr Wo-watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This delay has been predicted in model scenarios and documented in field studies (Korhonen, 1990;Håkanson et al, 1992Håkanson et al, , 1996Ugedal et al, 1997). Peak radiocaesium in fish has been shown to depend on the time of year, fish size, rates of food consumption, growth and water temperature (Ugedal et al, 1997), although the importance of the concentration of potassium, an analogue of caesium, in lake waters has been demonstrated by a number of authors (Kolehmainen et al, 1967;Preston et al, 1967;Rowan & Rasmussen, 1994;Smith et al 2000b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Strand et al (1999) reported CFs for selected fresh water fish (pike, perch and roach) in artificial reservoirs in the southern Urals (Russia) in the range of 240e1400 L kg À1 . Smith et al (2000bSmith et al ( , 2002 have reported fish-water CFs for perch, rudd, roach, gudgeon, ruffe, bream and goldfish in the range of 10 2 e10 4 L kg À1 in 10 lakes in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. Hanslík et al (2005) have reported somewhat greater fish-water CFs for the fish sampled in Orlik Reservoir (the Vltava river basin), in the range of 1000e2000 L kg À1 .…”
Section: Concentration Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%