It has been said Thailand needs more energy for its growing economy and that the world needs eco-friendly energy sources to stave off catastrophic global warming. So, to encourage this, we might ask 'should Thailand develop nuclear energy?' The answer is 'no'. Nuclear energy is not going to push Thailand towards cost-effective, efficient and climate-friendly energy use. If nuclear energy is forced upon Thailand by the government, its people and its environment will not only be just as vulnerable to climate change but also be subjected to chronic radioactive pollution, whilst risking both a disastrous accident and the spread of nuclear and radiological weapons.
Introduction: Thailand's nuclear plansThe rapidly developing nature of many Asian economies dictates that an increase in energy demand is highly likely (Asif and Muneer 2005). For example, Thailand's GDP is forecasted to have a positive evolution over the next 5 years of around 5-7%. Because of such forecasts region-wide, numerous Asian countries have tried to redevelop and diversify their energy strategies in order to circumvent problems surrounding both the satisfaction of rising domestic electricity demand and the desire to secure independent energy. Thailand is among those countries with a clear aim to develop alternative power sources.Given the impending decision of the Thai government regarding nuclear energy (Thai News Agency 2010), and given the promise of the Thai authorities to reassess the nuclear option in wake of the Fukushima incident in Japan (Thai News Agency 2011), there is a need to debate whether Thailand should go forward with its plan to build nuclear power plants. This article attempts to introduce and encourage this debate at the level of Asian public policy analysis by clearly enunciating the reasons why Thailand should forego the nuclear energy.Thailand's main energy source today is natural gas imported from Burma; comprising some two-thirds of its energy supply. This is a worry for the government for two main reasons: