1975
DOI: 10.1029/rs010i010p00853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio measurements of oceanic winds at long ranges: An evaluation

Abstract: Oceanic winds were measured locally by anemometers and remotely by an HF skywave radar at ranges exceeding 3000 km. Wind velocity was deduced from sea backscatter Doppler spectra. These spectra were often perturbed by ionospheric motion, yet wind direction was measured to within ±16° and wind speed to within ±4 m sec−1. Better measures of wind speed should exist at shorter ranges or with better ionospheric conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for an early approach by Stewart and Barnum (1975) and the multi-frequency method by Vesecky et al (2005), wind speed derivation techniques to date are based on the analysis of the second-order sidebands. Dexter and Theodorides (1982) provided a method using wave height (H s ) and peak frequency (f p ) to estimate wind speed by relating these parameters to wind speeds required to generate waves with similar characteristics.…”
Section: Wind Speed and Direction Estimation From Hf Radarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except for an early approach by Stewart and Barnum (1975) and the multi-frequency method by Vesecky et al (2005), wind speed derivation techniques to date are based on the analysis of the second-order sidebands. Dexter and Theodorides (1982) provided a method using wave height (H s ) and peak frequency (f p ) to estimate wind speed by relating these parameters to wind speeds required to generate waves with similar characteristics.…”
Section: Wind Speed and Direction Estimation From Hf Radarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of the second-order signal suffers from reduced range coverage (when compared with the first-order signal) and also there might be parts of the ocean spectrum contributing to the second-order signal that are not related to local wind conditions (e.g., swell). Stewart and Barnum (1975) suggested wind speed derivation from the widening of the first-order Bragg peaks, but their approach using sky-wave HF radar data was found to be limited (cf. Green et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The transmitted electromagnetic signal propagates along the conductive sea surface and is backscattered by the resonant ocean's surface gravity waves with exactly half the wavelength transmitted (Crombie 1955). Furthermore, a modulation of the signals scattered by ocean waves in response to the wind has been used to estimate wind direction and, in some cases, wind speed near the ocean surface (Long and Trizna 1973;Stewart and Barnum 1975;Shearman and Wyatt 1982;Shen et al 2012). These first-order Bragg lines are Doppler shifted (a fraction of a hertz above and below the transmitted signal) by Bragg resonant surface gravity waves and ocean currents propagating radially toward or away from the radar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long and Trizna (1973) used radar at Chesapeake Bay to map winds in the North Atlantic, and Stewart and Barnum (1975) evaluated the accuracy of that technique. Shearman and Wyatt (1982) describe the results of mapping winds during the JASIN experiment.…”
Section: Wind Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phased-array radars have also been used to measure currents. Stewart and Joy (1974) used a multifrequency radar on San Clemente Island to measure the vertical current shear at two bearings. Ha (1979) used the multifrequency Stanford radar with a highly directional transmitting antenna to measure currents along its boresight and compared his measurements with drifting spar buoys.…”
Section: Current Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%