2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio astronomical image formation using constrained least squares and Krylov subspaces

Abstract: Aims. Image formation for radio astronomy can be defined as estimating the spatial intensity distribution of celestial sources throughout the sky, given an array of antennas. One of the challenges with image formation is that the problem becomes ill-posed as the number of pixels becomes large. The introduction of constraints that incorporate a priori knowledge is crucial. Methods. In this paper we show that in addition to non-negativity, the magnitude of each pixel in an image is also bounded from above. Indee… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One would naturally want to estimate x 2 from the dirty image. This is supported by recent work showing that x can be bounded by the dirty image (Wijnholds & van der Veen 2011;Sardarabadi et al 2016). …”
Section: Further Reduction By Thresholdingsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…One would naturally want to estimate x 2 from the dirty image. This is supported by recent work showing that x can be bounded by the dirty image (Wijnholds & van der Veen 2011;Sardarabadi et al 2016). …”
Section: Further Reduction By Thresholdingsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…We have demonstrated its superiority over previously proposed CLS algorithms in a simulated experiments. The full version of this paper [23] will provide examples for the simulated 3C catalog as well as measured data. It will also provide the full implementation of the algorithm which is computationally simple but requires careful use of Krylov spaces to prevent the need to store very large matrices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We end up with conclusions and extensions. Due to space limitations, the implementation details of the active set technique as well as comparison of the algorithm to other algorithms on real data will appear in the full version of this paper [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the problem can be regularized by posing a nonnegativity constraint on the solution (Briggs 1995). The resulting Non-negative LS (NNLS) optimization can be implemented using the active set method (Sardarabadi, Leshem & van der Veen 2016) and similarly consists of two levels of iterations: (i) an outer loop to iteratively find the sparse support of the image and (ii) an inner loop in which a dimension reduced version of the LS problem is solved.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Imaging Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%