2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fourier dimensionality reduction model for big data interferometric imaging

Abstract: Data dimensionality reduction in radio interferometry can provide savings of computational resources for image reconstruction through reduced memory footprints and lighter computations per iteration, which is important for the scalability of imaging methods to the big data setting of the next-generation telescopes. This article sheds new light on dimensionality reduction from the perspective of the compressed sensing theory and studies its interplay with imaging algorithms designed in the context of convex opt… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, due to its instability when real data is used, the MORESANE and IUWT convex optimization algorithms are only useful in very specific cases. So far, most compressed sensing methods for radio interferometric deconvolution have only been demonstrated on relatively simple test cases, that do not include calibration errors or w-terms, and with a small number of visibilities and a small image size (e.g., Carrillo et al 2014, Junklewitz et al 2016, Kartik et al 2017. As was shown in this paper, the MORESANE compressed sensing approach does well in simple cases, but performs less well on data with calibration errors or with artefacts from spectral curvature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Nevertheless, due to its instability when real data is used, the MORESANE and IUWT convex optimization algorithms are only useful in very specific cases. So far, most compressed sensing methods for radio interferometric deconvolution have only been demonstrated on relatively simple test cases, that do not include calibration errors or w-terms, and with a small number of visibilities and a small image size (e.g., Carrillo et al 2014, Junklewitz et al 2016, Kartik et al 2017. As was shown in this paper, the MORESANE compressed sensing approach does well in simple cases, but performs less well on data with calibration errors or with artefacts from spectral curvature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%