2021
DOI: 10.1163/22116257-10010007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical-Nationalist Podcasting under a Post-Fascist Condition

Abstract: This article sketches fascism’s ideological morphology under a post-fascist condition. It builds empirically on three years of ethnographic studies of the radical-nationalist podcast Motgift [Antidote], disclosing that (i) fascist multivocality characterizes and feeds the rhizomic structure of Swedish radical nationalism; (ii) fascist narration locates protagonists and antagonists in driving a plot of ‘genocide against the white race’; and (iii) fascist temporality reinforces ideas of a lost past and degenerat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With support in a qualitative approach, the observational study (Gil, 2008) follows the analysis of documentaries, interviews and news, recent and short duration, previously identified, selected and transcribed that reference the performance of the G10 favelas. To this end, it is recognized that content produced on media platforms represents an increasingly recognized source of research evidence, such as podcast investigations recently conducted by Howard-Sukhil, Wallace and Chakrabarti ( 2021), Vasquez Heilig liget al (2021), Lundström and Lundström (2021), Moten (2021) and Hoydis (2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With support in a qualitative approach, the observational study (Gil, 2008) follows the analysis of documentaries, interviews and news, recent and short duration, previously identified, selected and transcribed that reference the performance of the G10 favelas. To this end, it is recognized that content produced on media platforms represents an increasingly recognized source of research evidence, such as podcast investigations recently conducted by Howard-Sukhil, Wallace and Chakrabarti ( 2021), Vasquez Heilig liget al (2021), Lundström and Lundström (2021), Moten (2021) and Hoydis (2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%