2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.84.062116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative polarization of electrons in a strong laser wave

Abstract: We reanalyze the problem of radiative polarization of electrons brought into collision with a circularly polarized strong plane wave. We present an independent analytical verification of formulae for the cross section given by D.\,Yu. Ivanov et al [Eur.\ Phys.\ J. C \textbf{36}, 127 (2004)]. By choosing the exact electron's helicity as the spin quantum number we show that the self-polarization effect exists only for the moderately relativistic electrons with energy $\gamma = E/mc^2 \lesssim 10$ and only for a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there was some discussion in the literature whether or not spin-flip transitions are relevant and the electrons do spin-polarize [24,28,78]. These discrepancies were attributed to different choices of the quantization direction [28]. We stress here that no such ambiguities arise when working in the density matrix formalism, where the final electron polarization vector unambiguously describes the polarization after the scattering.…”
Section: Physical Example Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, there was some discussion in the literature whether or not spin-flip transitions are relevant and the electrons do spin-polarize [24,28,78]. These discrepancies were attributed to different choices of the quantization direction [28]. We stress here that no such ambiguities arise when working in the density matrix formalism, where the final electron polarization vector unambiguously describes the polarization after the scattering.…”
Section: Physical Example Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…If one does not employ the density matrix formalism the initial polarization direction coincides with the chosen basis for the quantization of the spin. In fact, there was some discussion in the literature whether or not spin-flip transitions are relevant and the electrons do spin-polarize [24,28,78]. These discrepancies were attributed to different choices of the quantization direction [28].…”
Section: Physical Example Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many proposals to generate unpolarized electronpositron beams in the nonlinear QED regime, see [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and references therein, and even avalanche-like electromagnetic cascades in the case of future extreme laser intensities 10 24 W/cm 2 , see [39][40][41][42] and references therein. Although the laser magnetic field can be much stronger (of the order of 10 5 T) than the synchrotron magnetic field (of order 1 T), the radiative polarization with laser fields is suppressed due to the symmetric character of the field [43][44][45][46], i.e., the particles in adjacent half-cycles are polarized oppositely. Attractiveness of a strong laser fields for particle polarization has been recently demonstrated in the case of a model laser field in the form of a strong rotating electric field [47,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the rapid development of ultrashort (duration ∼ tens of femtoseconds) ultraintense (peak intensity ∼ 10 22 W cm −2 , and the corresponding magnetic field ∼ 4 × 10 5 Tesla) laser techniques [17,18] is providing opportunities to investigate electron polarization effects in such strong laser fields, analogous to the Sokolov-Ternov effect. A plenty of theoretical works have been performed in nonlinear Compton scattering, e.g., see [19][20][21][22][23] and the references therein. However, only a small polarization can be obtained in a monochromatic laser field [24] or a laser pulse [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%