1995
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.51.1312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative electron capture by bare and H-like Si and Cl ions using the channeling technique and the associated solid-state effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the present observations are in qualitative agreement with the enhancement of the REC x-ray yields and the REC energy shifts due to solid-state effects in heavy ion channeling, with similar [15,16] and will also be useful to calculate the projectile energy loss in fullerenes since it depends on the plasma oscillation.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the present observations are in qualitative agreement with the enhancement of the REC x-ray yields and the REC energy shifts due to solid-state effects in heavy ion channeling, with similar [15,16] and will also be useful to calculate the projectile energy loss in fullerenes since it depends on the plasma oscillation.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…In ion-solid collisions, the collective electronic response is known to give rise to a dynamic screening and a wake of electron density fluctuations trailing the ions [13,14]. Such a solidstate effect on REC (radiative electron capture) [15,16], resonant coherent excitation [17,18], and convoy electron production (see [13]) has been identified. The Stark splitting due to the wakefield has also been observed in the Ly x-ray emission yields in e-capture by bare ions in thin solid targets [19,20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, our former measurements of K-REC with 60 MeV/u Kr 36+ ions (Z p v 0 /v= 1.1) under channeling conditions agree perfectly with the Stobbe formula (with an absolute uncertainty of ± 10%) [6]. Tribedi et al [5] used the linear response scaling [2] of the local electron density to explain the excess of REC cross sections in channeling relative to gas targets. We prefer to consider an increase of electron density instead of an increase of cross sections, which are defined for a single ion-electron (or ion-atom) collision.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In contrast to pure ion-atom collisions as in gaseous targets, the ion-solid interaction allows one to study the dynamics of atomic collisions in the presence of neighboring atoms. So called "solid-state effects" on the collision are still not fully understood [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Besides the interaction of the ion with the bulk material, it has been shown that for slow, highly charged ions the interaction with the surface plays an important role (see, e.g., [7] for an overview).…”
Section: (Received 2 May 2000)mentioning
confidence: 99%