2004
DOI: 10.1086/421314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative Cooling and Heating and Thermal Conduction in M87

Abstract: The crisis of the standard cooling flow model brought about by Chandra and XMM-Newton observations of galaxy clusters has led to the development of several models that explore different heating processes in order to assess whether they can quench the cooling flow. Among the most appealing mechanisms are thermal conduction and heating through buoyant gas deposited in the intracluster medium (ICM) by active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We combine Virgo/M87 observations of three satellites (Chandra, XMM-Newton, and Be… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(121 reference statements)
4
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The external pressure is p =ρ ICM k T /(μ m H ) (where ρ ICM is the density of ICM, T is the gas temperature, μ= 0.6 the mean molecular weight and m H is mass of the hydrogen atom), which is presently not known for MRC 0116+111. We can obtain an order of magnitude estimate for H cav if we take fiducial values, ρ ICM = 1.67 × 10 −26 gm cm −3 (for a proton number density of 10 −2 cm −3 ) and T = 2.32 × 10 7 K (2 keV), which are typical of the gaseous environment around a miniradio‐halo source like M87 or Perseus A at the centre of a cooling core (Ghizzardi, Molendi & Pizzolato 2004). This gives a pressure p = 5.3 × 10 −11 dynes cm −2 and an enthalpy H cav = 2.06 × 10 60 V 70 erg for a cavity volume V 70 = V /(70 cm 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external pressure is p =ρ ICM k T /(μ m H ) (where ρ ICM is the density of ICM, T is the gas temperature, μ= 0.6 the mean molecular weight and m H is mass of the hydrogen atom), which is presently not known for MRC 0116+111. We can obtain an order of magnitude estimate for H cav if we take fiducial values, ρ ICM = 1.67 × 10 −26 gm cm −3 (for a proton number density of 10 −2 cm −3 ) and T = 2.32 × 10 7 K (2 keV), which are typical of the gaseous environment around a miniradio‐halo source like M87 or Perseus A at the centre of a cooling core (Ghizzardi, Molendi & Pizzolato 2004). This gives a pressure p = 5.3 × 10 −11 dynes cm −2 and an enthalpy H cav = 2.06 × 10 60 V 70 erg for a cavity volume V 70 = V /(70 cm 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We de-project the XMM-Newton profiles of the local clusters in Table 2 following the method described in Ettori (2002) and Ghizzardi et al (2004) and estimate the Fe masses of these clusters within r 2500 with Eq. (1).…”
Section: +22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearing in mind that thermal conduction models routinely fail in the innermost regions of cool cluster cores (e.g. Markevitch et al 2003; Zakamska & Narayan 2003; Ghizzardi et al 2004; Kaastra et al 2004), it is important to note that parallel viscous heating should be especially important in these relatively cold ( T ∼ 1 keV) and strongly magnetized ( B ∼ 10 μG) regions. A balance between parallel viscous heating and radiative cooling, however, does contain the implicit assumption that the thermal conduction is relatively unimportant.…”
Section: Implications: Cluster Equilibrium Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage is that this ensures smooth gradients for computing the conductive heating rates. The profiles for A478 and A1795 were taken from Dennis & Chandran (2005) and the profiles for M87 were taken from Ghizzardi et al (2004). For A1835 (Sanders et al 2010) and Hydra A (David et al 2001), the electron number density was fitted using with β= 0.593, r c = 32.42 kpc and n 0 = 0.115 cm −3 (for A1835) and β= 0.393, r c = 10.9 kpc and n 0 = 0.0669 cm −3 (for Hydra A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%