1994
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90221-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation therapy in the conservative treatment of carcinoma of the anal canal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
9

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Impairment of anal function depends, in large measure, on the extent of prior surgical intervention or on subsequent biopsy, and this can become a permanent problem. Interstitial brachytherapy is associated with a higher incidence of anal dysfunction as a result of tissue necrosis; this ranges from 2%-15% [41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Treatment-related Toxicitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impairment of anal function depends, in large measure, on the extent of prior surgical intervention or on subsequent biopsy, and this can become a permanent problem. Interstitial brachytherapy is associated with a higher incidence of anal dysfunction as a result of tissue necrosis; this ranges from 2%-15% [41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Treatment-related Toxicitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Key words: Anal carcinoma; Anal margin; Radiochemotherapy] prospective randomized trials, mainly because longterm results after radiation alone were available from different centers. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] In the early 1970s, Papillon and colleagues 3,4 reported on the use of cobalt 60 (Co-60) sources with remarkable treatment techniques and fractionation schedules for anal canal carcinoma. Tumor control and sphincter preservation rates have been as high as 80 percent and 66 percent, respectively, with Grade 3 proctitis being in the range of 10 to 15 percent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards risk factors, Peiffert et al [13] compared the value of different prognostic factors from 9 studies, reporting only T stage consistently as a prognostic factor in 8 of 9 studies, whereas the influence of other factors such as N category, sex, and age was inconsistent [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In our evaluation, T stage was a strong factor predicting CFS and showed a tendency for DSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%