2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation skin injury caused by percutaneous coronary intervention, report of 3 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High doses in interventional procedures are common but the focus has been on tissue reactions and injuries, as injuries have continued to be reported ever since the early 1990 ′ s [3,[41][42][43][44]. There are well established guidelines by various organizations to avoid injuries [40,[45][46][47][48] including action before, during and after the procedure.…”
Section: High Doses In Interventional Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High doses in interventional procedures are common but the focus has been on tissue reactions and injuries, as injuries have continued to be reported ever since the early 1990 ′ s [3,[41][42][43][44]. There are well established guidelines by various organizations to avoid injuries [40,[45][46][47][48] including action before, during and after the procedure.…”
Section: High Doses In Interventional Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTO PCI, typically due to longer time involved, is one of the predictors of increased radiation dose [ 7 , 8 ]. The injury can lead to severe consequences for the patient, including skin injury [ 9 ] (see Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Complications Related To Cto Pci –mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposures of patients exceeding 100 mSv effective dose were extremely rare in medical imaging until the introduction of multislice CT and fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGI). Thus, CT and FGI are of major concern regarding radiation safety in medical imaging [36]. CT and fluoroscopy account for approximately 10% of all imaging procedures, but contribute approximately 80% to the mean collective dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%