2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1674-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-Induced Skin Injuries to Patients: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know

Abstract: For a long time, radiation-induced skin injuries were only encountered in patients undergoing radiation therapy. In diagnostic radiology, radiation exposures of patients causing skin injuries were extremely rare. The introduction of fast multislice CT scanners and fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGI) changed the situation. Both methods carry the risk of excessive high doses to the skin of patients resulting in skin injuries. In the early nineties, several reports of epilation and skin injuries following… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
54
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiation-induced gastrointestinal manifestations of ARaS manifest as nausea, vomiting, and bloody diarrhea. Severe dermatological injury with burns, desquamation, epilation, and ulceration can occur after significant radiation exposure even in the absence of ARaS [58], as exemplified by our clinical vignette #1. The above manifestations are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Radiation Injurymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Radiation-induced gastrointestinal manifestations of ARaS manifest as nausea, vomiting, and bloody diarrhea. Severe dermatological injury with burns, desquamation, epilation, and ulceration can occur after significant radiation exposure even in the absence of ARaS [58], as exemplified by our clinical vignette #1. The above manifestations are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Radiation Injurymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…• in procedures anticipated to be technically difficult, unusually prolonged, • in FGIs performed in the same region within the previous 3 months • in patients with increased radiosensitivity (especially due to younger age or genetic predisposition for details, see [17][18][19]) • where radiation therapy has been used or is planned for the same anatomic region.…”
Section: Potentially High Dose Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissues at risk are the skin, hair and during neurointerventions the lenses of the eyes [17,20,21]. Stochastic effects are related to effective dose, for example, to the ovaries during pelvic embolization or the thyroid during interventions in the head and neck region.…”
Section: Potentially High Dose Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posterior se realizó predilatación con balón de 2.0 x 18 mm y 2.5 x 18mm, y finalmente implante de stent medicado a DA de 3.0 x 30 mm. Con apoyo de imagen Clear Stent se observó falta de expansión de stent en su segmento proximal por lo que se post dilató dicho segmento con balón NC 3.5 x ses 6 . Con este creciente número, la incidencia de LCR ha aumentado, estimada actualmente entre 1:10.000 a 1:100.000 procedimientos, pero el riesgo verdadero se desconoce 4 .…”
Section: Caso Clínicounclassified