1994
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90346-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation optic neuropathy after megavoltage external-beam irradiation: analysis of time-dose factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
167
1
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
167
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This opened up a new era of RT in pONSM. As with earlier reports, RT rarely caused significant tumor shrinkage on imaging, [65][66][67][68][69][70] a frequent reason for surgeons not to recommend RT in cases of rapid visual decline but to recommend surgery to immediately alleviate pressure to visual pathways. 75,76 However, it must be clearly stated that improvement in visual function can occur even during the course of RT, 77 as well as later on in the follow-up period, in neither case dependent on tumor shrinkage, but rather RT-induced edema decrease and ''decompression'' of the functional nerve structures.…”
Section: Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This opened up a new era of RT in pONSM. As with earlier reports, RT rarely caused significant tumor shrinkage on imaging, [65][66][67][68][69][70] a frequent reason for surgeons not to recommend RT in cases of rapid visual decline but to recommend surgery to immediately alleviate pressure to visual pathways. 75,76 However, it must be clearly stated that improvement in visual function can occur even during the course of RT, 77 as well as later on in the follow-up period, in neither case dependent on tumor shrinkage, but rather RT-induced edema decrease and ''decompression'' of the functional nerve structures.…”
Section: Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…64,65 If the total dose increases to 54 Gy, the risk of optic neuropathy rises to roughly 5%. 66,67 However, in the study on head and neck cancer 67 with a dose of <59 Gy no injury was observed in 106 optic nerves. With 60 Gy, the 15-year actuarial risk of developing optic neuropathy was 47% with fraction sizes of 1.9 Gy, but was only 11% with fraction sizes <1.9 Gy.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Brada et al reported a need for hormonal replacement therapy in 30% and 50% of patients 10 and 19 years after radiotherapy 16 . Optic neuropathy is a serious complication, but it is rare after fractionated radiotherapy to doses of 45-54 Gy; Parsons et al reported no optic nerve injuries in 106 optic nerves that received a total radiation dose of less than 59 Gy 17 . The reported risk of optic neuropathy after fractionated radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas lies between 1% and 5% 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation therapy is often performed in patients with unresectable cancer or patients in whom surgery is considered difficult because of older age or comorbidities. However, since 1992, the efficacy of CRT has been well documented, and CRT has been clearly shown to improve cure rates compared with radiotherapy alone [1,2,[5][6][7][8][9]. Currently, the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend CRT for esophageal cancer such as medically unfit for surgery or surgery not elected case [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%