1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(98)01407-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation levels in cyclotron-radiochemistry facility measured by a novel comprehensive computerized monitoring system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE [ 18 FDG] is the most commonly used radiopharmaceutical in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) (Mishani et al 1999). 18 F is produced in cyclotrons through a number of possible nuclear reactions before being converted into 18 FDG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE [ 18 FDG] is the most commonly used radiopharmaceutical in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) (Mishani et al 1999). 18 F is produced in cyclotrons through a number of possible nuclear reactions before being converted into 18 FDG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While whole-body radiation doses received by staff in nuclear medicine and PET clinics (Zanzonico et al 2008;Covens et al 2007;Sharma et al 2006;Eschner et al 2000;Ostertag et al 1991), cyclotron production facilities (Major 2009;Mishani et al 1999) and finger/extremity measurements within routine dispensing and handling of radiopharmaceuticals (Vanhavere et al 2008;Wrzesień et al 2008;Ginjaume et al 2007;Tandon et al 2007;Pant et al 2006;Saether et al 2005;Martin and Whitby 2003;Dhanse et al 2000) have been previously reported, the published data on finger/ extremity radiation doses received by staff performing routine quality control of 18 FDG is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the finger/extremity doses received during this process and determine whether or not staff would need to be designated as classified radiation workers as a result of the work undertaken (Ionizing Radiation Regulations 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%