1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.43.5243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-induced amorphization of ordered intermetallic compounds CuTi,CuTi2, andCu4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 In particular the mechanical, structural, and thermal properties of the crystalline and amorphous phase compare well with experiments, as indicated in previous studies. [21][22][23] The control of temperature and pressure to achieve isothermal and isobaric conditions is obtained by a Berendsen 24 thermostat and barostat, respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…20 In particular the mechanical, structural, and thermal properties of the crystalline and amorphous phase compare well with experiments, as indicated in previous studies. [21][22][23] The control of temperature and pressure to achieve isothermal and isobaric conditions is obtained by a Berendsen 24 thermostat and barostat, respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The disadvantage is that the processes inherent to more energetic ballistic events, such as the effects of shock waves, high displacement densities, and thermal spike on defect production, are not captured. Also not captured are the dependences of phase transformations, such as amorphization in ordered intermetallic compounds [15] on Frenkel pair concentrations or dose. However, such approaches that add Frenkel pairs with time are often limited to smaller simulation cell sizes and are unable to capture the slow evolution of microstructure when Frenkel pairs are added one-byone with time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…21,[34][35][36] The ion flux was modeled selecting the impact times randomly in the Poisson distribution 37 such that the average flux corresponded to the one simulated with PIC. The energies were generated in a random distribution corresponding exactly to that obtained from the PIC simulations and the impact positions on the surface were generated randomly within a circle of radius r =3-25 nm.…”
Section: B Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%