1987
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1987.4337498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation hard 1.0μm CMOS technology

Abstract: This paper describes radiation test results of a radiation hard CMOS technology with 1.0 gm minimum geometry features. The radiation goals of this technology are to ensure the MOS devices are functional after 10 Mrad total dose irradiation, are single event upset hardened to less than lE-10 errors per bit-day, are transient upset immune to 1E9 rads/sec and are latch-up free.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With all one's or alternate one's and zero's (denoted as CB or "checkerboard" in the When an alternate pattern of one's and zero's is stored in the registers, the measured saturation cross section was 4.5 x 10-4 cm2. This is in good agreement with the average cross section of the one's and zero's state, 4.1 x 10-4 cm2, and confirms that the "golden chip" test procedure is measuring upsets in the D-latches and not other circuitry. for all one's, almost a factor of three larger than the measured saturation cross section for the Rev A parts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With all one's or alternate one's and zero's (denoted as CB or "checkerboard" in the When an alternate pattern of one's and zero's is stored in the registers, the measured saturation cross section was 4.5 x 10-4 cm2. This is in good agreement with the average cross section of the one's and zero's state, 4.1 x 10-4 cm2, and confirms that the "golden chip" test procedure is measuring upsets in the D-latches and not other circuitry. for all one's, almost a factor of three larger than the measured saturation cross section for the Rev A parts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It has been intentionally designed to withstand severe radiation environments including SEU [3]. The part is fabricated at AT&T Allentown in a 1.25-pm 2-level metal radiation hardened technology [4] and is immune to latchup due to the structure of the technology. The totaldose radiation tolerance of 64K and 256K SRAMs fabricated in this technology have been discussed previously [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former mechanism is referred to as "number" fluctuations while the latter is termed "mobility" fluctuations. 4 Data from narrow-channel MOSFETs confirm that both effects can be important [19]. In general, noise studies on n-channel MOSFETs tend to agree with predictions that neglect the mobility fluctuation mechanism while studies on p-channel MOSFETs do not [14].…”
Section: Trapping Model For the Noisementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The processing of these wafers has been described elsewhere [1,2]. Measurements have also been performed on devices from two additional wafers, one from AT&T's 1-µm radiation hardened technology (Lot 11370, Wafer 50) [4] and the other from Sandia's 3-µm "mod B" radiation tolerant technology (Lot DE152D, Wafer 22) [5]. Devices from this latter wafer have identical dimensions to those listed above and an oxide thickness of 45 nm.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the SEU data of the TC17-and the TA670-provided scaling effect derived solely from the lateral dimensional reductions, since both TC17 and TA670 were fabricated with the same 1-pm process. 5…”
Section: Ta670 Ano the Modified Ta670 With Thicker Gate Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%