2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(00)80696-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation fire modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yao et al developed a global soot model for fires [36,37] where f v $ P 2 , which had been validated and applied in the modeling of liquid n-Heptane pool fires [38] based on experiments conducted at Lhasa [3]. The square dependence of pressure also coincides with the results in radiation fire modeling proposed by De ris as [39] j $ f v $ P 2 ; where j is the soot absorption coefficient. The incident flame heat flux is given as [40] _ q 00…”
Section: Soot and Flame Radiationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Yao et al developed a global soot model for fires [36,37] where f v $ P 2 , which had been validated and applied in the modeling of liquid n-Heptane pool fires [38] based on experiments conducted at Lhasa [3]. The square dependence of pressure also coincides with the results in radiation fire modeling proposed by De ris as [39] j $ f v $ P 2 ; where j is the soot absorption coefficient. The incident flame heat flux is given as [40] _ q 00…”
Section: Soot and Flame Radiationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Some potential soot precursors, such as some PAH, are also known carcinogens [3]. Furthermore, soot is an important factor in the rapid spread of accidental fires through radiant heat transfer [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning radiometer measurements [5] above of line and axisymmetric buoyant fuel jets show that the radiant output per unit flame volume is also independent of fire-scale for optically thin flames. These results are explained by the microscale combustion process being controlled by the Kolmogorov microscale which is virtually independent of scale for purely buoyant diffusion flames [6].…”
Section: Flame Heightsmentioning
confidence: 84%