2007
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation exposure to the population of Europe following the Chernobyl accident

Abstract: On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident an attempt has been made to evaluate the impact of the Chernobyl accident on the global burden of human cancer in Europe. This required the estimation of radiation doses in each of the 40 European countries. Dose estimation was based on the analysis and compilation of data either published in the scientific literature or provided by local experts. Considerable variability has been observed in exposure levels among the European populations. The a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas there is practically no jump in 1987 in France (sex odds ratio of jump (SOR)=1.0003; p= 0.8489), there is after all a noticeable, however insignificant, jump in Germany (SOR=1.0019; p=0.2133) and an extremely significant jump in the Russian Federation (SOR=1.0088; p<1.0E−25). Because France was less exposed than Germany and Germany was less exposed than the Russian Federation (Drozdovitch et al 2007), we observe a qualitative doseresponse association between the fallout levels and the sex odds jump heights from 1987 onward. Together with the fact that the jumps in the sex odds trends follow the exposure in time, strong evidence of causality is obtained.…”
Section: Analysis Of European and Us Data 1950 To 1990mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Whereas there is practically no jump in 1987 in France (sex odds ratio of jump (SOR)=1.0003; p= 0.8489), there is after all a noticeable, however insignificant, jump in Germany (SOR=1.0019; p=0.2133) and an extremely significant jump in the Russian Federation (SOR=1.0088; p<1.0E−25). Because France was less exposed than Germany and Germany was less exposed than the Russian Federation (Drozdovitch et al 2007), we observe a qualitative doseresponse association between the fallout levels and the sex odds jump heights from 1987 onward. Together with the fact that the jumps in the sex odds trends follow the exposure in time, strong evidence of causality is obtained.…”
Section: Analysis Of European and Us Data 1950 To 1990mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Maps of Cs-37 deposition show that exposure levels throughout the study area are low, with little variation among the oblasts studied. Estimates of region-specific average whole-body doses accumulated over the period 1986–2005 were 1.7 mSv in Chernihiv oblast, 5.7 mSv in Zhytomyr, 3.9 mSv in Kyiv oblast and 1.3 mSv in Kyiv City(16). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the even distribution of 137 Cs throughout the body, resulting organ doses are relatively uniform. An estimation of effective whole-body dose due to 137 Cs exposure at the population-based level suggested low levels of exposure in general (Drozdovitch et al, 2007). For the study cohort participants the mean external dose for the period from 1986 through 2006 was estimated to be 10 mGy and the mean internal dose due to 137 Cs incorporation to be 3 mGy (Drozdovitch et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radioactive iodine exposure is primarily to the thyroid gland, while radioactive cesium exposure can involve all body organs. In Belarus, the highest densities of 137 Cs ground deposition occurred in Gomel oblast (Figure), where the area residents could have received average effective whole-body doses of about 10 millisievert (mSv) accrued during the period of 1986 – 2005 (Drozdovitch et al, 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%