2018
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation exposure during image-guided endoscopic procedures: The next quality indicator for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Abstract: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most frequently used image-guided procedures in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Post-ERCP pancreatitis is an important concern, and prophylaxis, cannulation and other related technical procedures have been well documented by endoscopists. In addition, medical radiation exposure is of great concern in the general population because of its rapidly increasing frequency and its potential carcinogenic effects. International organizations and radiologic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost all diagnostic procedures have previously set DRLs that have been updated for several years, but not enough interventional procedures have yet received DRLs. Nationwide DRLs for endoscopic procedures performed under fluoroscopy are still not well established [27,28]. Currently, there is still not enough available data on RE from endoscopic FGPs, although the European Commission, UK, and German DRL set a single value for ERCP [29-31. The present report of third quartile values of FGPs, which is the first of its kind, will serve as a useful reference (▶ Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all diagnostic procedures have previously set DRLs that have been updated for several years, but not enough interventional procedures have yet received DRLs. Nationwide DRLs for endoscopic procedures performed under fluoroscopy are still not well established [27,28]. Currently, there is still not enough available data on RE from endoscopic FGPs, although the European Commission, UK, and German DRL set a single value for ERCP [29-31. The present report of third quartile values of FGPs, which is the first of its kind, will serve as a useful reference (▶ Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of DRLs in the UK achieved a reduction of approximately 50% in the radiation dose in typical X-ray examinations over 15 years 13. However, there is still not enough available data on RE for gastrointestinal fluoroscopic procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), small bowel endoscopy and enteral stent placement; these techniques are still being developed and have recently been used with increasing frequency 14 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) refers to quality indicators in the following three categories: (1) preprocedure quality indicators: indication, sedation, and informed consent; (2) intraprocedural quality indicators: cannulation, procedure success rate, radiation dose, and fluoroscopy time (FT); and (3) postprocedure quality indicators: reporting and adverse events. [1,2] The use of fluoroscopy presents the inherent risk of radiation exposure to both staff and patients. The increased use of ERCP as a therapeutic modality has often led to increased ERCP duration, with a subsequent increase in the radiation dose administered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased use of ERCP as a therapeutic modality has often led to increased ERCP duration, with a subsequent increase in the radiation dose administered. [2,3] Such exposure is not well documented, and little data on this topic have been collected to date. [4] However, radiation exposure is of great concern for patients and medical staff because of its rapidly increasing frequency and potential carcinogenic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation