2017
DOI: 10.1007/174_2017_148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Dose Optimization in CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tube voltage was directly proportional to the radiation dose, i.e., exponentially the radiation dose changes due to changes in the tube voltage between 2.5-3.1 times. Thus, the higher the tube voltage, the higher the radiation dose 7 . The radiation dose was influenced by several factors, one of which is the setting of the tube voltage (kVp).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tube voltage was directly proportional to the radiation dose, i.e., exponentially the radiation dose changes due to changes in the tube voltage between 2.5-3.1 times. Thus, the higher the tube voltage, the higher the radiation dose 7 . The radiation dose was influenced by several factors, one of which is the setting of the tube voltage (kVp).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies it was mentioned that the use of SAFIRE was able to reduce noise by 50-60% compared to using FBP. 6,7 The increase in CNR is due to a decrease in noise which is the implication of the use of SAFIRE reconstruction. Setting the higher SAFIRE strength level may result in decreased noise and increased CNR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation