2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Dose Limits for Bioanalytical X-ray Fluorescence Microscopy

Abstract: Analytical approaches that preserve the endogenous state of the examined system are essential for the in vivo study of bioinorganics. X-ray fluorescence microscopy of biological samples can map elements in vivo at subcellular resolutions in tissue samples and multicellular organisms. However, X-ray irradiation induces modifications that accumulate with dose. Consequently, the utility of X-ray fluorescence microscopy is intrinsically limited by the radiation damage it causes and the degree to which it alters th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter, however, the exposed region was identified with the stronger ultrastructural damage and shrinking, thus suggesting its higher radio-sensitivity than the cryofixed sample. Interestingly, in line with Bedolla et al (2018), Jones et al (2017) reported that the sample's Ultralene film overlay was also damaged. Therefore, disentangling sample damage with that of the substrate is an additional challenge that must be tackled in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the interaction pattern in biological samples of different preparation protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the latter, however, the exposed region was identified with the stronger ultrastructural damage and shrinking, thus suggesting its higher radio-sensitivity than the cryofixed sample. Interestingly, in line with Bedolla et al (2018), Jones et al (2017) reported that the sample's Ultralene film overlay was also damaged. Therefore, disentangling sample damage with that of the substrate is an additional challenge that must be tackled in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the interaction pattern in biological samples of different preparation protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The height of the Si-H band included less than 5% of the maximum absorbance, which would be at the noise level for the cellular systems reported by Gianoncelli et al Needless to mention, the sample state plays an important role in radiation damage, and lyophilized samples have long been known to withstand radiation doses of the order of 10 7 Gy (Williams et al, 1993). Single cells were, in turn, presented morphologically intact upon substantially higher doses up to 10 10 Gy (Le Gros et al, 2016;Jones et al, 2017). Lombi et al (2011) discovered that XRF micro-tomography experiments induce the dislocation of chemical elements in fresh apical tissue samples of cowpea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For samples sensitive to radiation damage, a cryogenic stream environment is available (Oxford Cryostream 700 Series), where the stream is directed downwards. It typically operates at À100 C and is effective in minimizing the influence of radiation damage in organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans (Jones et al, 2017) and hydrated plant material (Jones, Kopittke et al, 2019). A jacket flow of dried facilitycompressed air is used to avoid the inherent noise, vibration and bulk of a local compressor.…”
Section: Sample Mounting and Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is important to note that the absorbed doses in SR-based studies of biological samples are extreme. Although radiation-induced damage can occur at doses of just a few grays (1 Gy = 1 J of absorbed radiation energy per 1 kg of absorbing tissue mass), the X-ray exposures in synchrotron-based studies reach the MGy (10 6 Gy) unit scale and higher [41,42]. By comparison, radiation doses from exposures to X-rays or gamma-rays in clinical procedures are below 1 Gy and are measured in units of cGy (10 −2 Gy) in external-beam radiation therapy, and in units of mGy (10 −3 Gy) in conventional diagnostic X-ray imaging and nuclear medicine procedures [43].…”
Section: Radiation-induced Damage In Biological Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%