Radiation dose and protection in dentistry

Okano, Toshio; Sur, Jaideep

doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2009.11.004

Cited by 83 publications

(88 citation statements)

References 59 publications

(73 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is less than that reported overseas, with one study finding 45% usage and another 72% . It is encouraging that NQ dentists are mainly using digital sensors that reduce exposure by up to 50% …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Investigation of radiation‐protection knowledge, attitudes, and practices of North Queensland dentists

Ihle

Neibling

Albrecht

et al. 2018

J of Invest & Clin Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim Queensland has current radiation‐protection guidelines; however, with the absence of data exploring compliance and implementation, the efficacy is unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes on radiation protection among private North Queensland (NQ) dentists. Methods A quantitative methodology was employed in an observational and descriptive study using questionnaires for data collection. Results Of the 154 questionnaires distributed, 63 were completed and returned. The respondents’ knowledge concerning the technical details of their equipment was limited, with 31.5% and 47% not knowing the tube voltage and current utilized for their machines, respectively. In total, 23.8% of dentists had limited knowledge about the speed of the conventional film they used, 90.5% of respondents agreed that the role of imaging in dentistry is important, and 75.8% dentists reported the thyroid as the most important organ to protect during dental radiography. Their knowledge regarding position‐distance rule was reasonably adequate; 80.3% of the dental practices appeared to follow the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency guidelines, 95.2% preferred taking radiographs if it was only urgent, and 69.8% identified a need for spreading awareness regarding radiation protection. Conclusions An opportunity and need for further continuing education was identified among NQ dentists to ensure safety of patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Investigation of radiation‐protection knowledge, attitudes, and practices of North Queensland dentists

Ihle

Neibling

Albrecht

et al. 2018

J of Invest & Clin Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although CBCT overcomes most of the limitations of conventional radiology and provides more accurate diagnostic information, the risk of radiation should be considered (2,3,27,28). When CBCT scanner with large FOV is used for nonsurgical endodontic treatment, the clinician should be conscious to minimize radiation dose.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Endodontic Application of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in South Korea

Kim

2012

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Apabila dosis paparan yang diberikan berada di atas ambang batas, maka keparahan kerusakan meningkat sesuai dosisnya. Sedangkan efek stokastik adalah efek yang timbul tanpa dipengaruhi besar dosis paparan 3,6 .…”

Section: Radiobiologi Sinar-x Dentalunclassified

Efek Stokastik Radiasi Sinar-X Dental Pada Ibu Hamil Dan Janin

Woroprobosari¹

2016

ODONTO : Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT%DFNJURXQG 'HQWDO UDGLRJUDSKLF H[DPLQDWLRQ LV RQH RI WKH PRVW IUHTXHQW radiological examinations carried out. X-rays in dental radiography is a shortwave electromagnetic rays that cause ionization reaction to any biological material in its path. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of stochastic HႇHFWV LQ JHQHUDO DV ZHOO DV WR SUHJQDQW ZRPHQ DQG IHWXVHV LQ SDUWLFXODU 'LVFXVVLRQ ,RQL]LQJ UDGLDWLRQ VXFK DV ;UD\ UDGLDWLRQ LV SRWHQWLDOO\ WHUDWRJHQLF 6DIH GRVH KDV QRW EHHQ ZHOO GH¿QHG DOWKRXJK WKHUH KDV EHHQ approved dosing limits. Gestational age most vulnerable is the end of week 2 WR ZHHNV SRVWFRQFHSWLRQ ,I WKH PXFK QHHGHG UDGLRJUDSKV RI D ZRPDQ ZKR is pregnant, then the X-ray exposure will be directed mostly to the head and neck area. &RQFOXVLRQ 7KHUHIRUH WKH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI WKH SULQFLSOH RI $/$5$ $V /RZ $V 5HDVRQDEO\ $FKLHYDEOH DV ZHOO DV JRRG SURWHFWLRQ LQFOXGLQJ LQVWUXPHQW control, protection of the room, the cumulative exposure dose control, and the use of apron throughout the process, is noteworthy. Such protection, especially for pregnant women and fetuses.

show abstract

Radiation dose and protection in dentistry

Cited by 83 publications

References 59 publications

Investigation of radiation‐protection knowledge, attitudes, and practices of North Queensland dentists

Investigation of radiation‐protection knowledge, attitudes, and practices of North Queensland dentists

Endodontic Application of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in South Korea

Efek Stokastik Radiasi Sinar-X Dental Pada Ibu Hamil Dan Janin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About