1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(98)01182-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation detection measurements with a new “Buried Junction” silicon avalanche photodiode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 the timing resolution as a function of the APD bias for an LGSO sample with 0.025 mol% Ce. The timing resolution is generally degrading near APD breakdown bias voltage due to increasing noise [4], [27]. However, the APD-LGSO detectors investigated in this paper demonstrated good timing resolution that remained fairly stable over the entire APD bias range, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Scintillation Characteristics With Apdmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…14 the timing resolution as a function of the APD bias for an LGSO sample with 0.025 mol% Ce. The timing resolution is generally degrading near APD breakdown bias voltage due to increasing noise [4], [27]. However, the APD-LGSO detectors investigated in this paper demonstrated good timing resolution that remained fairly stable over the entire APD bias range, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Scintillation Characteristics With Apdmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…While a small gain of only 3.7%-7% in timing resolution was obtained for LYSO-LYSO coincidences, a significant improvement of 17%-22% was achieved for LGSO-LGSO coincidences. These results suggest that the filtered interpolation algorithm can achieve better performance with scintillators having a lower SNR and slower decay time such as LGSO, and also stress the importance of applying adequate APD bias for optimum performance [12], [21].…”
Section: B Sensitivity To Apd Biasmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Using 1 MBq of 18 F, it is possible to obtain sufficient statistics within 15 min to be able to find time offsets for the entire scanner by automatically fitting gaussian functions to the peaks. An important calibration procedure for APD-based PET scanners is to individually tune the bias of each APD detector to achieve optimum timing resolution [2,16,17]. This calibration procedure is usually computationnaly expensive and time consuming due to the large amount of coincidence data to be acquired for all LORs in the scanner FOV and to the many iterations required before an optimal setting is found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%