2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation calibration of FAO56 Penman–Monteith model to estimate reference crop evapotranspiration in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential evapotranspiration was simulated by the radiationmodified FAO56-Penman-Monteith model (FAO56-PM; Yin et al 2008). The trend of the time series (T) in past 48 years was calculated using the conventional leastsquares linear fitting method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential evapotranspiration was simulated by the radiationmodified FAO56-Penman-Monteith model (FAO56-PM; Yin et al 2008). The trend of the time series (T) in past 48 years was calculated using the conventional leastsquares linear fitting method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the magnitude of the daytime soil-heat flux beneath the grass reference surface is relatively small, it can be ignored (Allen et al, 1998). Gauge-based ET o is estimated based on the radiation-calibrated FAO56 Penman-Monteith model, which uses the calibrated Ångström solar radiation formula (Yin et al, 2008).…”
Section: Meteorological Data and Model Performance Matricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After comparing many models the FAO and International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage working groups recently recommended using FAO56 (Allen et al 1998). Many studies indicated that FAO56 was better than the other two modules for calculating evapotranspiration and resulted in better simulations of biomass and yield (Jamieson et al 1998;Ines et al 2001;Irmak et al 2003a, b;Sau et al 2004;Lo´pez-Cedro´n et al 2008;Yin et al 2008). We, therefore, chose the FAO56 option for calculating potential evapotranspiration.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%