2011
DOI: 10.4310/cntp.2011.v5.n4.a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rademacher sums, moonshine and gravity

Abstract: In 1939 Rademacher derived a conditionally convergent series expression for the elliptic modular invariant, and used this expression -the first Rademacher sum -to verify its modular invariance. By generalizing Rademacher's approach we construct bases for the spaces of automorphic integrals of arbitrary even integer weight, for groups commensurable with the modular group. Our methods provide explicit expressions for the Fourier expansions of the Rademacher sums we construct at arbitrary cusps, and illuminate va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
143
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key idea was that the multiplicative lift of the modular J-function could be interpreted as the denominator formula for a specific GKM, now commonly called the Monster Lie algebra, whose root system carries an action of the Monster group M. The generalized moonshine ideas of Norton [14] suggest that similar GKMs should exist for each class [g] ∈ M [20,21,54]. In the context of Mathieu Moonshine the role of generalized Kac-Moody algebras has so far not been understood.…”
Section: Open Problems and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key idea was that the multiplicative lift of the modular J-function could be interpreted as the denominator formula for a specific GKM, now commonly called the Monster Lie algebra, whose root system carries an action of the Monster group M. The generalized moonshine ideas of Norton [14] suggest that similar GKMs should exist for each class [g] ∈ M [20,21,54]. In the context of Mathieu Moonshine the role of generalized Kac-Moody algebras has so far not been understood.…”
Section: Open Problems and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step was done in the landmark paper [van Ekeren, et al, 2015], steps 2,3, and 5 were done in [Carnahan ≥2017], step 4 was done in [Carnahan 2012], and step 6 was done in [Carnahan 2010]. We shall describe the last step in more detail.…”
Section: Conjecture (Generalized Moonshinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the sense of [Dong-Lepowsky 1993]) formed from a sum of irreducible twisted V -modules, constructed in [van Ekeren, et al, 2015] with minor adjustments in [Carnahan ≥2017] to account for anomalous weights. Our functor is the following composite: …”
Section: No Ghost Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the constant term c 0 might need more care for the proof of convergence, it can be recovered by analyzing the behavior of the Kloosterman sum at n = 0 [3]. The method was later developed for modular forms of various weights, modular groups and multiplier systems in several works like [5,[20][21][22][23][24][59][60][61][62], to quote just a few. 10 Progress in the context of harmonic Maass forms has also been achieved in [64][65][66].…”
Section: Jhep07(2017)094mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding a certain non-holomorphic integral of the shadow to the form restores modularity at the expense of holomorphicity. When the shadow is a cusp form, the Rademacher series can be applied to recover the Fourier coefficients of mock Jacobi forms [5,[20][21][22][23][24]. However, the mock Jacobi forms arising in the counting problem of 1/4-BPS states in Type IIB string theory on K3 × T 2 have mixed mock components, and their shadows are not cusp forms.…”
Section: Jhep07(2017)094mentioning
confidence: 99%