2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20216350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar Emitter Signal Recognition Based on One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network with Attention Mechanism

Abstract: As the real electromagnetic environment grows complex and the quantity of radar signals turns massive, traditional methods, which require a large amount of prior knowledge, are time-consuming and ineffective for radar emitter signal recognition. In recent years, convolutional neural network (CNN) has shown its superiority in recognition so that experts have applied it in radar signal recognition. However, in the field of radar emitter signal recognition, the data are usually one-dimensional (1-D), which takes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the parameters, like carrier frequency, pulse width and bandwidth, are changing in a wider range, the testing dataset with a large number of samples could include as many situations as possible. Besides, the average classification accuracy of the well-trained model in [23] on a testing dataset containing 385,000 samples is almost 4% lower than that in a validation dataset containing 30,800 samples. Therefore, in order to increase the reliability of the classification and evaluate the real performance of the methods, we decide to use a large testing dataset.…”
Section: Dataset and Parameters Settingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As the parameters, like carrier frequency, pulse width and bandwidth, are changing in a wider range, the testing dataset with a large number of samples could include as many situations as possible. Besides, the average classification accuracy of the well-trained model in [23] on a testing dataset containing 385,000 samples is almost 4% lower than that in a validation dataset containing 30,800 samples. Therefore, in order to increase the reliability of the classification and evaluate the real performance of the methods, we decide to use a large testing dataset.…”
Section: Dataset and Parameters Settingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In Table 1, the simulated RMS parameters are the dynamic range [9]. To simulate the actual received signal, the modulated signal had the range of a certain parameter, and the noise was added.…”
Section: Experimental Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification and recognition based on deep learning have many advantages. Without human assumptions and intervention about the features to be extracted, the deep neural network can effectively learn the features of the signals [9]. Deep learning can better resist the interference of noise in the extraction of signal features, thereby improving the generalization ability and accuracy in the identification of RMS [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimized network improves the multilayer representation of features, and reduces the number of required samples. Wu et al [27] presented a novel attention-based one-dimensional (1D) CNN to extract more distinguishing features, and identify the signals from radar radiation sources. Specifically, the features of the given 1D signal series are extracted directly by the 1D convolutional layer, and weighed according to their importance to the recognition by the attention mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%