2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-019-07911-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar Absorbing Structures Using Frequency Selective Surfaces: Trends and Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RADAR [30]: The detection of human activity can be performed using RADAR-based monitoring that has a significantly larger bandwidth [31]. RADAR utilises a bandwidth of up to 1.79 GHz, while WiFi technology only uses up to 20 MHz [32]. The micro-Doppler information extraction methods based on RADAR provide a higher spatial resolution of around 20 cm [33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RADAR [30]: The detection of human activity can be performed using RADAR-based monitoring that has a significantly larger bandwidth [31]. RADAR utilises a bandwidth of up to 1.79 GHz, while WiFi technology only uses up to 20 MHz [32]. The micro-Doppler information extraction methods based on RADAR provide a higher spatial resolution of around 20 cm [33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,21 However, the former can only be achieved in a limited angular region and remains effective only at higher frequencies, 20 and experts believe that the latter is the most effective way of manufacturing these types of structures as it offers the possibility of introducing frequency-selective features in the design during the manufacturing process. [22][23][24] The implementation of this type of technology using highperformance GFRP composites is currently being considered by numerous researchers and engineers worldwide not only because of their outstanding mechanical properties but also because of the flexibility of tailoring their electromagnetic properties effectively by controlling their manufacturing parameters. 11,25 Although radar-absorbing structures can be designed in different shapes and configurations, GFRP-based multilayered wideband absorbers with broadband characteristics are among the commonly used types of radarabsorbing structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the aforementioned radar cross‐section areas can be reduced by properly shaping the target, or developing the radar‐absorbing material/structures 12,21 . However, the former can only be achieved in a limited angular region and remains effective only at higher frequencies, 20 and experts believe that the latter is the most effective way of manufacturing these types of structures as it offers the possibility of introducing frequency‐selective features in the design during the manufacturing process 22–24 . The implementation of this type of technology using high‐performance GFRP composites is currently being considered by numerous researchers and engineers worldwide not only because of their outstanding mechanical properties but also because of the flexibility of tailoring their electromagnetic properties effectively by controlling their manufacturing parameters 11,25 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial approach to RCS reduction involves the utilization of radar-absorbing materials (RAMs) or radar-absorbing structures (RASs), which absorb incoming radar signals and effectively decrease them [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. However, these methods can be costly, not only in terms of manufacturing but also for maintenance purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%