2014
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.548388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rad52/Rad59-dependent Recombination as a Means to Rectify Faulty Okazaki Fragment Processing

Abstract: Background: How faulty Okazaki fragments are repaired remains unclear. Results: The DNA annealing activity of Rad52 and sister chromatid cohesion are important in the repair of faulty Okazaki fragments. Conclusion: Rad52/Rad59-mediated sister chromatid recombination is a major means of repairing faulty Okazaki fragments. Significance: The faithful repair of faulty Okazaki fragments is critical for genome stability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since MMS treatment leads to replication stress and most known suppressors of srs2 Δ reduce Rad51 nucleoprotein filament formation [78,91,92], we propose that SUMOylation of Rad59 is important for restraining toxic Rad51-mediated recombination during replication stress. This conclusion goes well with other reports of a role for Rad59 in DNA replication stress tolerance [3,93,94]. Similarly, the fact that we observed reduced recombination and increased MMS and Zeocin survival of srs2 Δ cells when mimicking constitutive SUMOylation of Rad52 is in agreement with the recent finding that toxic Rad51-dependent HR structures fail to form in srs2Δ rad52-SMT3ΔGG [78] and with the reduced recruitment of Rad51 to foci in the rad52-SMT3ΔGG rad59-SMT3ΔGG mutant (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since MMS treatment leads to replication stress and most known suppressors of srs2 Δ reduce Rad51 nucleoprotein filament formation [78,91,92], we propose that SUMOylation of Rad59 is important for restraining toxic Rad51-mediated recombination during replication stress. This conclusion goes well with other reports of a role for Rad59 in DNA replication stress tolerance [3,93,94]. Similarly, the fact that we observed reduced recombination and increased MMS and Zeocin survival of srs2 Δ cells when mimicking constitutive SUMOylation of Rad52 is in agreement with the recent finding that toxic Rad51-dependent HR structures fail to form in srs2Δ rad52-SMT3ΔGG [78] and with the reduced recruitment of Rad51 to foci in the rad52-SMT3ΔGG rad59-SMT3ΔGG mutant (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Rad51-independent HDR has also been reported for CRISPR-Cas9 (Collonnier et al, 2017). Rad52 and Rad59 are involved in Rad51-independent processing of Okazaki fragments (Lee et al, 2014), and the loss of detectable ARF in rad59 Δ and rad52 Δ rad59 Δ compared to the neutral effect of its paralog ( rad52 Δ) suggests a unique role for Rad59 to promote annealing of ssODNs at the replication fork. Although Rad52 may contribute to ssODN annealing at the replication fork, it also mediates loading of Rad51 to RPA-bound ssDNA (Song and Sung, 2000) whereas Rad59 does not contain a known Rad51 binding domain (Erler et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both mutants are unable to suppress pol30-K164R (Figure 3C), implying that the suppression effect acts through the Rad52 DNA annealing ability. The rad52-Δ327 allele (45) lacks the C-ter of Rad52, which is required for interaction with Rad51. The rad52-QDDD-AAAA allele (45) is impaired in its interaction with RPA and recombination mediator activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rad52-Δ327 allele (45) lacks the C-ter of Rad52, which is required for interaction with Rad51. The rad52-QDDD-AAAA allele (45) is impaired in its interaction with RPA and recombination mediator activity. Both alleles are thus unable to stimulate Rad51 activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%