2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Editing at DNA Replication Forks Enables Multiplex Genome Engineering in Eukaryotes

Abstract: SUMMARY We describe a multiplex genome engineering technology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on annealing of synthetic oligonucleotides at the lagging strand of DNA replication. The mechanism is independent of Rad51-directed homologous recombination and avoids the creation of double-strand DNA breaks, enabling precise chromosome modifications at single base-pair resolution with efficiencies >40% without unintended mutagenic changes at the targeted genetic loci. We observed the simultaneous incorporation of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(70 reference statements)
2
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these two methods, homologous recombination was also introduced through the λ‐Red recombineering system but used double‐strand DNA as substrates. MAGE was also adapted for use in S. cerevisiae , such as yeast oligo‐mediated genome engineering (YOGE) and eukaryotic MAGE (eMAGE) . MAGE and its related methods have been successfully applied in directed evolution on the genome‐scale .…”
Section: Directed Evolution On the Genome Levelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In these two methods, homologous recombination was also introduced through the λ‐Red recombineering system but used double‐strand DNA as substrates. MAGE was also adapted for use in S. cerevisiae , such as yeast oligo‐mediated genome engineering (YOGE) and eukaryotic MAGE (eMAGE) . MAGE and its related methods have been successfully applied in directed evolution on the genome‐scale .…”
Section: Directed Evolution On the Genome Levelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, at present, most of the CRISPR/Cas9-based directed evolution methods rely on integration of relative small (80-120 bp) DNA fragments (Barbieri et al, 2017;Garst et al, 2017;Guo et al, 2018) and may require time-consuming construction of donor variant libraries and/or relative costly DNA synthesis of diversified array-based oligos (Nyerges et al, 2018;Roy et al, 2018). With CasPER, multiplex genome engineering of larger genomic loci is now demonstrated at very high efficiencies along the full size of donor fragment lengths, and should thereby enable cost-effective, high-throughput and robust evolution studies of even complex multi-genic traits in any organism supporting genome integration of heterologous DNA by homologous recombination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cas9 is an RNA-guided endonuclease that introduces double-stranded breaks (DSBs) at almost any target DNA locus where a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM; NGG) is present, yielding several hundred thousand genomic target sites in an average eukaryotic genome (DiCarlo et al, 2013). With the ability to target and integrate heterologous DNA fragments at high efficiencies by way of homologous recombination, several studies have investigated directed evolution and sequence-function relationships of regulatory and genic regions in genomic contexts, albeit using short oligonucleotides as repair donors (Barbieri et al, 2017;Findlay et al, 2014;Garst et al, 2017;Storici et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2009). In addition, larger mutagenized DNA fragments were in vivo assembled and integrated into the S. cerevisiae genome by employing Cas9 and a selection marker (Ryan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaling up deep mutational scanning experiments to the scale of the genome is at present out of reach: bottlenecks include the precise, genome-wide introduction of individual mutations (mutagenesis efficiency and accuracy), sequencing costs and associating mutations at distant loci. The first is improving with advances in genome engineering, particularly from CRISPR-Cas9-based methods (Barbieri, Muir, Akhuetie-Oni, Yellman, & Isaacs, 2017;Haimovich, Muir, & Isaacs, 2015;Roy et al, 2018). The second is continuing to improve, following a long-term trend of decreasing costs (but see (Muir et al, 2016) for the alternative challenge of managing increasing amounts of data); and the third is becoming more feasible with emulsion-based generalized DNA assembly technologies that encapsulate single cells and enable distal DNA sites to be linked by sequencing (either by directly ligating mutated sites adjacent to each other (Haliburton, Shao, Deutschbauer, Arkin, & Abate, 2017;Zeitoun et al, 2015) or, more scalably, by ligating them to a cell-specific DNA barcode (Zeitoun, Pines, Grau, & Gill, 2017)) ( Figure 9).…”
Section: Experimental Approaches For Genome-wide Genotype-phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%