2016
DOI: 10.1590/0101-31572016v36n03a09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racionalidade limitada e a tomada de decisão em sistemas complexos

Abstract: RESUMO: Este artigo tem o objetivo de apresentar o modelo comportamental de racionalidade limitada proposto por Herbert Simon para analisar o processo de tomada de decisão dos agentes em sistemas complexos, marcados pela não ergodicidade e pelo desenvolvimento de trajetórias em aberto. O artigo apresenta a noção de escolha logicamente consistente em contraponto à análise axiomática proposta pela teoria neoclássica. Propõe o uso de modelos de simulação em computador do tipo agent-based modeling (ABM) como um in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…When the HCM is concerned with complementing the logical basis, avoiding only the plane of subjectivity (HCM2) or when they do not always have all the data to decide (HCM3), it is possible to point out a process of SDM with strong use of intuition and/or resulting from a structure of limited rationality (Simon, 1955). In other words, it is not possible for a decision maker to achieve all the options due to the physical impossibility, cognitive and political limitations, as well as the level of disconnection between this information and the high cost involved in this process (Melo & Fucidji, 2016;Simon, 1955). Other peculiarities could justify the use of intuition in this process of fragility of the use of unlimited logic, such as heterogeneity and variety of information, high degree of uncertainty or even little time to decide (Simon, 1955), as evidenced in one of the statements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the HCM is concerned with complementing the logical basis, avoiding only the plane of subjectivity (HCM2) or when they do not always have all the data to decide (HCM3), it is possible to point out a process of SDM with strong use of intuition and/or resulting from a structure of limited rationality (Simon, 1955). In other words, it is not possible for a decision maker to achieve all the options due to the physical impossibility, cognitive and political limitations, as well as the level of disconnection between this information and the high cost involved in this process (Melo & Fucidji, 2016;Simon, 1955). Other peculiarities could justify the use of intuition in this process of fragility of the use of unlimited logic, such as heterogeneity and variety of information, high degree of uncertainty or even little time to decide (Simon, 1955), as evidenced in one of the statements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary theories are born in Darwin's theory, so that the evolution or progression of the manager would be something natural, born. Mello and Fucidji (2016) define that the algorithm becomes a standardized form and logically consistent, where information is received and results are generated from them, making a decision to be made sequentially with uniform procedures.…”
Section: Hierarchical Levels and Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fonte: Tszesnioski (2017 No discurso supracitado os trechos em destaque "unidade que participa de uma esfera maior" e "muitas decisões não passam pela gente" rementem-se ao princípio da hierarquia de cargos e da sequência de instâncias descrito por Weber (2004), que envolve uma organização fixa de poder de mando e obediência, de maneira que os atores hierarquicamente superiores monitoram os inferiores. Quando o princípio das competências está plenamente desenvolvido, pelo menos no aparato público, as atribuições de cada instância é fixa, sendo isso estabelecido em regras, não podendo, na ausência de um ator, a instância superior agregar suas funções as que já possui (WEBER, 2004, pp.…”
Section: A Auditoria Do Sus Como Processo Educativo Eficazunclassified