2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:sers.0000032305.48347.6d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial Stereotypes and Gender in Context: African Americans at Predominantly Black and Predominantly White Colleges

Abstract: In this study, relationships among stereotype expectations, gender, and academic self-concept and performance of African American students in predominantly White and predominantly Black college contexts were examined. Stereotype expectations are students' perceptions of biased treatment and evaluation within their major classroom settings (SE). Findings indicated that students' majors were related to stereotype expectations, as well as to their academic competence. Our results also provide evidence of gender a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Black males have been stereotyped as aggressive and anti-intellectual. 34,35,74,75 Black men have been also stereotyped as "endangered, aggressive, angry, superhuman, subhuman, lazy, hyperactive, jailed, and paroled, on probation, lost, loveless, incorrigible, or just simply self-destructive". 76,77 In line with subordinate male target hypothesis, racial discrimination may be mostly a male to male phenomenon.…”
Section: Assarimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black males have been stereotyped as aggressive and anti-intellectual. 34,35,74,75 Black men have been also stereotyped as "endangered, aggressive, angry, superhuman, subhuman, lazy, hyperactive, jailed, and paroled, on probation, lost, loveless, incorrigible, or just simply self-destructive". 76,77 In line with subordinate male target hypothesis, racial discrimination may be mostly a male to male phenomenon.…”
Section: Assarimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of campus racial climate in the outcomes of historically disadvantaged racial groups has received increased empirical attention in recent years (e.g., Cabrera et al 1999;Hurtado 1992;Hurtado et al 1999;McClelland and Auster 1990). Although findings regarding the effect of institutional racial composition are mixed (e.g., Pascarella et al 1989;Wassmer et al 2004), the evidence suggests that institutions that have high minority enrollments tend to exhibit more supportive environments for disadvantaged racial groups than do institutions that have low minority enrollments (e.g., Chavous et al 2004;Fries-Britt and Turner 2002;Hagedorn et al 2007;Pascarella and Terenzini 2005). Thus, one could theorize that, if historically disadvantaged racial groups are systematically cooled out, this process occurs less frequently, or to a lesser degree, in institutions that enroll a disproportionately large percentage of minority students.…”
Section: Recent Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several examples to date of researchers operationalizing stereotype threat and related concepts in survey research (Chavous et al 2004;Massey and Fischer 2005;Morgan and Mehta 2004;Osborne 1995Osborne , 2001. Some of these studies have found innovative ways of testing stereotype threat and related concepts using datasets that were not specifically designed to test stereotype threat, such as the Morgan and Mehta (2004) study that used the National Educational Longitudinal Survey (NELS) and Osborne (1995) work with High School and Beyond.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies have found innovative ways of testing stereotype threat and related concepts using datasets that were not specifically designed to test stereotype threat, such as the Morgan and Mehta (2004) study that used the National Educational Longitudinal Survey (NELS) and Osborne (1995) work with High School and Beyond. On the other hand, Chavous et al (2004) fielded their own survey containing several instruments specifically designed to measure the effects of stereotype threat on outcomes for minorities on a predominantly white campus and a historical black campus. These studies reveal the typical tradeoff between depth in smaller scale studies that are often cross-sectional and the breadth offered by nationally representative larger scale surveys that are more likely to be longitudinal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%