2009
DOI: 10.1177/0192513x09333946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial and Gender Differences in Kin Support

Abstract: This article uses qualitative and quantitative data for a recent birth cohort from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing study to compare kin support patterns between African Americans and Hispanics. It focuses on financial and housing support from grandparents and other kin during the transition to parenthood. Qualitative analysis ( n = 122 parents) uncovers distinctions in the way African American and Hispanic parents discuss their family networks, with African Americans emphasizing relations with female … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both Wu and Martinson (1993) and Fomby and Cherlin (2007) found greater evidence for the stress mediation effects for White children than for African American children. African American families-and Hispanic families to some degree-tend to feature women-centered kinship networks (Domínguez & Watkins, 2003;Haxton & Harknett, 2009) as well as considerable extended family involvement and high likelihood of extended family co-residence (Dunifon, Ziol-Guest, & Kopko, 2014;Landale, Oropesa, & Bradatan, 2006). Support networks that contain more extended kin and co-resident ties offer greater support resources, particularly for impoverished families (Kana'iaupuni, Donato, Thompson-Colón, & Stainback, 2005).…”
Section: Child Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Wu and Martinson (1993) and Fomby and Cherlin (2007) found greater evidence for the stress mediation effects for White children than for African American children. African American families-and Hispanic families to some degree-tend to feature women-centered kinship networks (Domínguez & Watkins, 2003;Haxton & Harknett, 2009) as well as considerable extended family involvement and high likelihood of extended family co-residence (Dunifon, Ziol-Guest, & Kopko, 2014;Landale, Oropesa, & Bradatan, 2006). Support networks that contain more extended kin and co-resident ties offer greater support resources, particularly for impoverished families (Kana'iaupuni, Donato, Thompson-Colón, & Stainback, 2005).…”
Section: Child Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interdependent orientation is thought to increase the salience of close relationships processes across the lifespan with resulting influences on cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions to others (Markus & Kitayama, 1991). Consistent with this reasoning, Hispanic/Latinos and African Americans appear to utilize and have greater expectations for the family as a significant source of support (Haxton & Harknett, 2009; Taylor, Hernandez, Nicklett, Taylor, & Chatters, 2013), and interdependent cultures appear to benefit more from the perception that support will be available (Kim, Sherman, & Taylor, 2008). Although it is less clear if African Americans and Hispanic/Latinos differ from non-Hispanic Whites on overall perceptions of support (Fogel, Albert, Schnabel, Ditkoff, & Neugut, 2003), these data suggest that they are more sensitive to such social processes so that perceiving high levels of social support might be particularly beneficial for them (Uchino, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In times of crisis—such as economic troubles or family disruption—these social networks help buffer the potentially adverse effects. In particular, groups may vary in how much grandmothers and other female kin provide help, either through intergenerational co-residence or otherwise (Haxton and Harknett 2009; Hunter 1997; Schans and Komter 2010). In the case of immigrants, access to support from kin especially can be limited by the fact that many immigrants’ kin do not live in the host country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%