2015
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e12592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial and ethnic differences in risk of second primary cancers among breast cancer survivors.

Abstract: Purpose-Disparities exist in breast cancer (BC) outcomes between racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Reasons for these disparities are multifactorial including differences in genetics, stage at presentation, access to care and socioeconomic factors. Less is documented on racial/ ethnic differences in subsequent risk of second primary cancers (SPC). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk of SPC among different racial/ethnic groups of women with BC. Methods-Retrospective cohort of 134,868 Non-H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the risks of SPM at specific sites, our findings were comparable with previous observations for SPMs in the digestive system, respiratory system, genital system, endocrine system, hematopoietic system and contralateral breast . Based on our analysis of the site‐specific adjusted SIRs, we found an inverse association of age with SPM risk, which was in agreement with several studies but only inconsistent with a retrospective study from Italy .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In terms of the risks of SPM at specific sites, our findings were comparable with previous observations for SPMs in the digestive system, respiratory system, genital system, endocrine system, hematopoietic system and contralateral breast . Based on our analysis of the site‐specific adjusted SIRs, we found an inverse association of age with SPM risk, which was in agreement with several studies but only inconsistent with a retrospective study from Italy .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This method estimates the hazard rate ratio (HR) and 95% CI by modeling the hazard of the cumulative incidence function while controlling for the competing risk of death and adjusting for the variables shown in Table as potential confounders. Fine and Gray regression was used to estimate associations with the risk of breast cancer death, controlling for the competing risk of death from other causes, among patients undergoing BCT compared with those receiving other treatments, and Cox regression was used to estimate associations with risk of death from all causes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%