2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race-Specific Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Risk Factors in Blacks and Whites in the Southern Community Cohort Study

Abstract: Despite a greater burden of traditional risk factors, atrial fibrillation (AF) is less common among black than whites for reasons that are unclear. We have examined race- and gender-specific influences of demographic, lifestyle, anthropometric and medical factors on AF in a large cohort of blacks and whites. Among white and black participants in the Southern Community Cohort Study age 65 and older receiving Medicare coverage from 1999–2008 (n=8,836), we ascertained diagnoses of AF (ICD-9 CM 427.3). Multivariat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PAF estimates of AF risk factors have been previously noted to be higher for NHBs than for NHWs [38]. However, in our study and others [7,8], the race–ethnic differential distribution of AF risk factors does not explain the lower incidence of AF among nonwhite participants. Because there appears to be a genetic predisposition among NHWs for AF [28], our results support continued investigation for unexplained AF risk factors among NHWs and/or protective factors among nonwhite populations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PAF estimates of AF risk factors have been previously noted to be higher for NHBs than for NHWs [38]. However, in our study and others [7,8], the race–ethnic differential distribution of AF risk factors does not explain the lower incidence of AF among nonwhite participants. Because there appears to be a genetic predisposition among NHWs for AF [28], our results support continued investigation for unexplained AF risk factors among NHWs and/or protective factors among nonwhite populations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Although debatable [8], several explanations have been suggested to explain differences in AF incidence among NHBs and NHWs such as under ascertainment of events because of poorer access to care among NHBs, differential mortality, or under ascertainment of events because of a higher incidence of paroxysmal AF in NHBs [27]. In a population of NHBs and NHWs, ECG indices such as P wave duration, area, and amplitude did not appear to explain the race–ethnic differences in AF prevalence [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and AF in type 2 DM is currently unknown, the putative role of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in AF development may have significant implications in terms of screening the increasing population of patients with liver abnormality [16]. Apart from the aforementioned risk factors, several additional parameters (aging [17], ethnicity [18][19][20][21][22], hyperuricemia [23], pulse pressure [24], heart rate recovery [25], and heart failure [26]) seem to be associated with increased AF risk in the setting of DM. The clinical and demographic parameters that influence the relationship between DM and AF are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Diabetes Mellitus As a Risk Factor For Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…19 Cases of incident AAA were defined as Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with at least one new medical claim with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM) diagnosis code of 441.3 (ruptured AAA) or 441.4 (AAA without rupture) within the Medicare institutional (Medicare Provider Analysis and Review, MEDPAR), Part-B carrier or outpatient base claims files during this period. Thus, in this study incident, AAA is defined as a new diagnosis made in the clinical setting through physician-initiated screening.…”
Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%