2017
DOI: 10.1177/2332649217742869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race Counts: Racial and Ethnic Data on the U.S. Census and the Implications for Tracking Inequality

Abstract: This article is a critical review of racial and ethnic categories on the U.S. Census with a focus on how the census categories affect opportunities to track racial and ethnic inequality. The authors summarize how motivations behind the census categories changed from a historical basis in controlling people of color and protecting Whiteness toward a contemporary orientation around equity. Yet, many issues remain that confound the racial and ethnic census data, which are then used in research. A look at these is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other minority groups such as Asian Americans, and Muslim Americans (who hold a religious minority identity) are similarly stereotyped as foreign (Hakim, Molina, & Branscombe, ; Zou & Cheryan, ), and excluded from the American cultural identity (Devos & Ma, ; Theiss‐Morse, ). Though several current anti‐immigration policies, such as building a wall on the southern U.S. border and adding a citizenship question to the 2020 Census are projected to especially impact Latin Americans (Strmic‐Pawl, Jackson, & Garner, ; Wines, ), future research should test contexts that could lead other ethnic minority populations to view identity questioning as prejudice. For example, policies banning immigration from majority Muslim countries might especially influence how Muslim Americans interpret identity questioning experiences and threaten their sense of belonging in the country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other minority groups such as Asian Americans, and Muslim Americans (who hold a religious minority identity) are similarly stereotyped as foreign (Hakim, Molina, & Branscombe, ; Zou & Cheryan, ), and excluded from the American cultural identity (Devos & Ma, ; Theiss‐Morse, ). Though several current anti‐immigration policies, such as building a wall on the southern U.S. border and adding a citizenship question to the 2020 Census are projected to especially impact Latin Americans (Strmic‐Pawl, Jackson, & Garner, ; Wines, ), future research should test contexts that could lead other ethnic minority populations to view identity questioning as prejudice. For example, policies banning immigration from majority Muslim countries might especially influence how Muslim Americans interpret identity questioning experiences and threaten their sense of belonging in the country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the US Census, we categorized race/ethnicity as follows: non-Latino white, non-Latino black, Latino, Asian and Pacific Islander (API), and AIAN. 11 Death certificate and census data collect ethnicity information using the category Spanish/Hispanic/Latino; we used the term Latino for this category. County-level SES was examined using data from the American Community Survey (2011-2015).…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they note that these problematic census data can potentially change policy and rhetoric about the affected populations. (Strmic‐Pawl, Jackson, and Garner ) . While the requirement to adhere to racial categorizations in federal research grants is an attempt to rectify past abuses, such as those that occurred within the Tuskegee Syphilis study (see Washington for details about this study) and mitigate the possibility of ignoring understudied/underrepresented groups, it, in effect, encourages researchers to impose a racialized study design sometimes without thoughtful regard to the role or meaning of race within the study.…”
Section: Race In the Context Of Social Science And Biomedicinementioning
confidence: 98%