“…Other scholars have conceptualized these notions in terms of descriptive and symbolic representation (Pitkin, 1967) and have examined the effect on active or substantive representation (Haider-Markel, Joslyn, & Kniss, 2000). These studies and others have regularly found that descriptive representation influences the behavior and attitudes of constituents (Gay, 2002) and is often conditioned upon societal identification (Theobald & Haider-Markel, 2009;Tyler & Huo, 2002). Representative bureaucracy theorists have also used these ideas to understand the conditions in which descriptive representation might lead to active representation (Meier, 1975(Meier, , 1993Meier & Smith, 1994;Meier, Wrinkle, & Polinard, 1999), and a number of diverse outcomes have been linked to minority representation, including the distribution of public expenditures and services (Eisinger, 1982) and the implementation of police reforms (Jacobs, 1998;Saltzstein, 1989).…”